Scoping Review and Bibliometric Analysis of the Term “Planetary Health” in the Peer-Reviewed Literature

Abstract

Background: Planetary health is an emerging holistic health field to foster interdisciplinary collaborations, integrate Indigenous knowledge, facilitate education, and drive public and policy engagement. To understand to what extent the field has successfully met these goals, we conducted a scoping review and bibliometric analysis. Methods: We searched 15 databases from 2005 to 2019 for peer-reviewed publications with the term "planetary health" in the title, abstract and/or keywords, with no language or geographical location limitations. We classified results into four categories (commentaries, comprehensive syntheses, educational material, and original research) and categorized original research according to expert-derived planetary health themes. Our bibliometric analysis highlighted publications over time, collaborations, and networks of keywords. Findings: Only 8.1% (n = 22) were research articles. Publications rose rapidly from 8 to 64 publications per year in 2015-2018. The top five author affiliation countries for most publications were the US, UK, Australia, Canada, and New Zealand, and the top five collaborations were a subset of pairwise combinations between the US, UK, Australia, and Canada. The most common author keywords were the following: planetary health, climate change, ecology, and non-communicable diseases. Keyword co-occurrences clustered around high-level concepts (e.g., Anthropocene) and food system-related topics; two clusters lacked a theme. Interpretation: We show that the term planetary health is used mainly in commentary-like publications, not original research. Additionally, more global collaborations are lacking. Interdisciplinary work, as represented by keyword co-occurrence networks, is developing but could potentially be extended. The planetary health community should promote more worldwide research and interdisciplinary collaborations.

A cross-sectional study on the knowledge of and interest in Planetary Health in health-related study programmes in Germany

“…Five foundational domains were identified within the Planetary Health education framework: i.e., interconnection with nature, the Anthropocene and health, systems thinking and complexity, equity and justice as well as movement building and systems change ( 10 ). Additionally, the need for transdisciplinary approaches in order to tackle the topic of Planetary Health has increasingly been recognized in research and education ( 30 ). This supports the idea for the need to transformation of education from traditional disciplinary thinking toward a truly inter- and transdisciplinary education, broadening Planetary Health further than only health-related studies.…”

Framing climate change as a human health issue: enough to tip the scale in climate policy?

“…We issue countless calls to action and provide suggestions for policies that could mitigate the impact of environmental destruction on human health. 1,2 Because of its global scale, the expected increase of its severity, and its inequitable impact, we have identified climate change as the biggest global health threat of the 21st century. 3 The evidence on the health impacts of climate change is clear-the effects are "large, increasing, and inequitably distributed".…”

Implementing local planetary health: Case study of Blue Mountains, Australia

“…Implementation of planetary health in public policy and governance has been limited. In their scoping review and bibliometric analysis, Rossa‐Roccor et al (2020) find that 10.4% of articles covered pathways to policy change or analysed policies. Otherwise, most articles could be characterised as calls to action.…”