2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.pmr.2014.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scoliosis, Spinal Fusion, and Intrathecal Baclofen Pump Implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the catheter reaches the desired level, the guide wire is removed, as well as the needle. 18 In our study, 22 patients died during the follow-up period corresponding to a mortality rate of 14%. In literature, this rate varies between 0 and 21%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…When the catheter reaches the desired level, the guide wire is removed, as well as the needle. 18 In our study, 22 patients died during the follow-up period corresponding to a mortality rate of 14%. In literature, this rate varies between 0 and 21%.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…In literature, this rate varies between 0 and 21%. 18,20,21,26 This difference can be explained by the inclusion of different conditions and different follow-up times.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Intrathecal baclofen for patients with CP safely and effectively reduces spasticity, pain, and dystonia; in addition, it confers superior functional abilities and results in improved management by caregivers. 1,2,[9][10][11][12]21,25,33,36,43,48 However, many patients who require baclofen present with concomitant scoliosis; their spinal torsion, or fusion mass and instrumentation, further increases the challenge of device implantation. 4,6,20,24,27,34,35,41,42 Moreover, procedural complications decrease the cost-benefit ratio of intervention.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…6,24,28,39 Although different techniques to circumvent this anatomical complexity have been described, each is associated with notable limitations. Authors have reported drilling through the fusion mass after localization with fluoroscopy, 11 using a K-wire to traverse the mass under fluoroscopic guidance, 43 and inserting catheters at the cervical spine or foramen magnum to avoid entry through the lumbar region altogether. 19,29,47 However, limitations of these approaches include risks of CSF leakage, catheter dislodgement, and adjacent neural injury.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%