2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1468-3083.2002.00442.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scleroderma ‘en coup de sabre’ and progressive facial hemiatrophy. Is it possible to differentiate them?

Abstract: The aim was to be able to evaluate the diagnosis of two diseases by a consensus of clinical opinion used in the Department of Dermatology of the National Institute of Paediatrics in Mexico City. To differentiate between scleroderma 'en coup de sabre' (SCS) and progressive facial hemiatrophy (PFH), colour slides of 13 patients diagnosed as SCS and nine as PFH were examined by two dermatologists and microscopic slides by two pathologists. In both cases, the slides were randomly presented and no clinical informat… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
52
0
6

Year Published

2005
2005
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
4
52
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…[3][4][5][6][7] Our data support the theory that they are in fact on the same spectrum of disease for the following reasons. First, of the 28 patients in our study with Parry-Romberg syndrome, 20 (71.4%) of them had some cutaneous facial sclerosis, 15 (53.6%) of them with en coup de sabre lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[3][4][5][6][7] Our data support the theory that they are in fact on the same spectrum of disease for the following reasons. First, of the 28 patients in our study with Parry-Romberg syndrome, 20 (71.4%) of them had some cutaneous facial sclerosis, 15 (53.6%) of them with en coup de sabre lesions.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…2 The relationship between these two entities is not entirely clear, although studies have suggested that a close relationship exists. [3][4][5][6][7] As en coup de sabre morphea and Parry-Romberg syndrome are relatively rare entities, virtually all information regarding demographics and clinical findings is based on case reports, small case series, and one Internet-based survey. 3 Similarly, not much is known about the efficacy of agents commonly used in treatment of these diseases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…147 Moreover, both disorders have comparable neurologic and ophthalmologic findings, 147 and both may respond to immunosuppressive treatment. 76,112,151,152 Furthermore, both conditions may show overlap or transition 14,17,28,43,44,58 ; although LSCS and PRS were found to coexist in many patients, [153][154][155][156] some have described patients with LSCS converting with time to PHA (Fig 4). 155,157 The prevalence of LSCS in conjunction with PRS is uncertain, but has been reported to range from 36.6% to 53.6%.…”
Section: Differential Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Congenital malformations 6 , autoimmune disease 26 , HIV protease inhibitor associated lipodystrophy syndrome 3 , aging 1,11 , trauma and radical operations in cancer treatment result in extraoral and intraoral soft tissue deficiencies of varying size. Current treatment mainly uses autogenous tissue transfer from the adjacent 42 area or another part of the body 19 .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%