2011
DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2011.2406
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scientific Opinion on Pyrrolizidine alkaloids in food and feed

Abstract: The European Food Safety Authority (EFSA) was asked by the European Commission to deliver a scientific opinion on pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PA) in food and feed. PAs are toxins exclusively biosynthesised by plants. To date, approximately 600 different PAs are known. Results for 13,280 bulk honey and 1324 retail honey samples were provided to EFSA by one Member State and 351 feed samples were provided by a second Member State. The EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) performed estimates of… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
119
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 211 publications
(124 citation statements)
references
References 175 publications
(382 reference statements)
4
119
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Regarding the hazard characterisation, the CONTAM Panel confirmed the uncertainties already identified in the 2011 opinion (EFSA CONTAM Panel, 2011), and noted additional uncertainties in particular related to the data sets used for the dose-response analysis for the characterisation of the carcinogenic hazard (see Section 2.1). However, the Panel confirmed that the main uncertainties remain considering the lack of toxicological data on most of the PAs of relevance for food and feed contamination.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 65%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Regarding the hazard characterisation, the CONTAM Panel confirmed the uncertainties already identified in the 2011 opinion (EFSA CONTAM Panel, 2011), and noted additional uncertainties in particular related to the data sets used for the dose-response analysis for the characterisation of the carcinogenic hazard (see Section 2.1). However, the Panel confirmed that the main uncertainties remain considering the lack of toxicological data on most of the PAs of relevance for food and feed contamination.…”
Section: Uncertainty Analysismentioning
confidence: 65%
“…This is supported by a series of human cases of intoxication following the consumption of herbal remedies derived from PA-producing plants (EFSA CONTAM Panel, 2011). In view of the uncertainty on the possible toxicity levels of PAs in humans and of the severity of the effects, the CONTAM Panel concluded that exposure levels less than 100 times lower than the aforementioned dose range of 1-3 mg PA/kg bw per day may be associated with the risk of acute/short-term effects.…”
Section: Acute Risksmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The acute/short-term toxicity of 1,2-unsaturated PAs in humans is characterised mainly by the onset of hepatic veno-occlusive disease (HVOD), associated with high mortality and, or possibly progressing to liver cirrhosis. In its 2011 scientific opinion on the presence of PAs in food and feed, from the evaluation of various human case reports, the EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM Panel) selected a lowest known PA dose associated with acute/short-term toxicity in humans of approximately 2 mg/kg bw per day for the assessment of acute risks (EFSA CONTAM Panel, 2011).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The formation of reactive pyrroles is considered to be the key step related to all the identified adverse effects (Fu et al, 2004). Therefore, the CONTAM Panel decided to focus on the risk assessment of 1,2-unsaturated PAs and their respective N-oxide forms (EFSA CONTAM Panel, 2011). Considering that all 1,2-unsaturated PAs share a common metabolic pathway leading to the formation of genotoxic and carcinogenic reactive pyrroles, the CONTAM Panel concluded that it was not appropriate to establish a health-based guidance value, and decided to adopt the Margin of Exposure (MOE) approach for genotoxic carcinogens to the sum of 1,2-unsaturated PAs, assuming equal potency.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%