No abstract

Recently, contamination of honey with pyrrolizidine alkaloids (PA) has been reported as potential health risk. Therefore, it was of interest to develop a reliable tool for selective and quantitative determination of PA in honey. Sample preparation of the novel method comprises strong cation exchange SPE (SCX-SPE), followed by two reduction steps using zinc and LiAlH(4), as well as subsequent silylation. During this procedure the separated PA are converted into the necin backbone, the common structural feature of PA toxicity, which is analyzed by GC-MS in the SIM mode. The procedure was validated using PA from extracts of Senecio vernalis as well as authentic PA standards including their corresponding N-oxides. The PA content of honey samples was quantified with heliotrine as internal standard. The method was applied to generate a dataset in order to evaluate the potential risk of PA contamination especially for retail honeys available on the German/European market. No selection criteria in terms of floral or geographical origin were applied on the samples before analysis. In total, 216 commercially available floral honey samples were analyzed. Among them 19 samples contained PA, in the range of 0.019-0.120 microg/g, calculated as retronecine equivalents. The reported method facilitates the selective determination of PA without the need to identify each individual PA independently. The PA contamination of honey is expressed in terms of a single sum parameter and no background information such as foraged plants and pollen analysis is necessary. The LOQ is 0.01 ppm with a S/N of 7:1.

Rose (Rosa hybrida) flowers produce and emit a diverse array of volatiles, characteristic to their unique scent. One of the most prominent compounds in the floral volatiles of many rose varieties is the methoxylated phenolic derivative 3,5-dimethoxytoluene (orcinol dimethyl ether). Cell-free extracts derived from developing rose petals displayed O-methyltransferase (OMT) activities toward several phenolic substrates, including 3,5-dihydroxytoluene (orcinol), 3-methoxy,5-hydroxytoluene (orcinol monomethyl ether), 1-methoxy, 2-hydroxy benezene (guaiacol), and eugenol. The activity was most prominent in rose cv Golden Gate, a variety that produces relatively high levels of orcinol dimethyl ether, as compared with rose cv Fragrant Cloud, an otherwise scented variety but which emits almost no orcinol dimethyl ether. Using a functional genomics approach, we have identified and characterized two closely related cDNAs from a rose petal library that each encode a protein capable of methylating the penultimate and immediate precursors (orcinol and orcinol monomethyl ether, respectively) to give the final orcinol dimethyl ether product. The enzymes, designated orcinol OMTs (OOMT1 and OOMT2), are closely related to other plant methyltransferases whose substrates range from isoflavones to phenylpropenes. The peak in the levels of OOMT1 and OOMT2 transcripts in the flowers coincides with peak OMT activity and with the emission of orcinol dimethyl ether.

No abstract

Some basil varieties are able to convert the phenylpropenes chavicol and eugenol to methylchavicol and methyleugenol, respectively. Chavicol O -methyltransferase (CVOMT) and eugenol O -methyltransferase (EOMT) cDNAs were isolated from the sweet basil variety EMX-1 using a biochemical genomics approach. These cDNAs encode proteins that are 90% identical to each other and very similar to several isoflavone O -methyltransferases such as IOMT, which catalyzes the 4 -O -methylation of 2,7,4 -trihydroxyisoflavanone. On the other hand, CVOMT1 and EOMT1 are related only distantly to (iso)eugenol OMT from Clarkia breweri , indicating that the eugenol O -methylating enzymes in basil and C. breweri evolved independently. Transcripts for CVOMT1 and EOMT1 were highly expressed in the peltate glandular trichomes on the surface of the young basil leaves. The CVOMT 1 and EOMT 1 cDNAs were expressed in Escherichia coli , and active proteins were produced. CVOMT1 catalyzed the O -methylation of chavicol, and EOMT1 also catalyzed the O -methylation of chavicol with equal efficiency to that of CVOMT1, but it was much more efficient in O -methylating eugenol. Molecular modeling, based on the crystal structure of IOMT, suggested that a single amino acid difference was responsible for the difference in substrate discrimination between CVOMT1 and EOMT1. This prediction was confirmed by site-directed mutagenesis, in which the appropriate mutants of CVOMT1 (F260S) and EOMT1 (S261F) were produced that exhibited the opposite substrate preference relative to the respective native enzyme.