Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms

Fukugawa, Nobuya

doi:10.1016/j.ijindorg.2005.07.005

Cited by 148 publications

(85 citation statements)

References 57 publications

(59 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Teknoparkların firmalara ve diğer kurumlara sağladığı coğrafi yakınlık, bu koşulların oluşmasına yardımcı olsa da tek başına yeterli değildir. Farklı ülkelerde teknoparklar üzerinde yapılmış ampirik araştırmalar, teknoparkların inovasyon performanslarını firmaların kendi aralarında, üniversitelerle ve park dışındaki firma ve kurumlarla kurdukları bağlantılarla ilişkilendirmişlerdir (Lai ve Shyu, 2005;Löfsten ve Lindelöf, 2005;Fukugawa, 2006;Squicciarini, 2009;Yang vd., 2009;Díez-Vial ve Montoro-Sánchez, 2015;Vásquez-Urriago vd., 2016). Bu çalışmada, bu ampirik çalışmaların sonuçlarından yola çıkarak bir teknoparkın başarılı olabilmesi için nasıl bir ilişki dinamiğine sahip olması gerektiğini tartışacağız.…”

Section: Popüler Bir Inovasyon Politikası Aracı: Teknoparklarunclassified

“…Üniversite öğrencilerinin teknopark girişimlerinde stajyer olarak çalışmaları da buna benzer sosyal ilişkilerin kurulmasında yardımcı olabilir (Motohashi, 2013). Bu bağlamda teknoparkın sağladığı coğrafi yakınlık sayesinde firmalar üniversiteyle hem kurumsal düzeyde hem de bireyler seviyesinde bağlantılar kurabilmekte olup, üniversite destekli inovasyon projelerine kolaylıkla erişebilmektedir (Löfsten ve Lindelöf, 2005;Fukugawa, 2006). Yapılan ampirik çalışmalarda da, coğrafi yakınlığın üniversite-firma işbirlikleri çerçevesindeki inovasyon faaliyetlerini olumlu yönde etkilediği ortaya konulmaktadır.…”

Section: Teknoparklarda Firmalar Ve üNiversite Arasındaki Ilişkilerunclassified

See 1 more Smart Citation

İnovasyon Beşi̇ği̇ Teknoparklarda İli̇şki̇ Di̇nami̇kleri̇

Döner¹

2016

kuiibf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Özet:Günümüzde inovasyon bölgelerin ve ülkelerin ekonomik kalkınma ve büyümelerinin arkasındaki temel güç olarak kabul edilmektedir. Bu bağlamda inovasyon faaliyetlerini destekleyen politikalar bütün dünyada popülerleşmiştir. Silikon Vadisi gibi başarılı örnekleri izleyen bilim ve teknoloji parkları ya da teknoparklar, inovasyon faaliyetlerinin coğrafi boyutunu ön plana çıkaran inovasyon politikalarından biridir. Bu çalışmada, teknoparklardaki firmaların ve üniversite gibi kuruluşların arasındaki ilişkiler ışığında coğrafi yakınlığın işbirliklerini ve inovatif ilişkileri ne derece kolaylaştırdığı incelenmektedir. Öncelikle, firmalar için birbirlerine yakın konumlanmış olmalarının, inovasyon performansı yüksek işbirlikleri kuracaklarını garanti etmeyeceğini anlamak gerekir. Ancak, coğrafi yakınlık inovasyon faaliyetleri için gerekli olan organizasyonel ve kurumsal bağlamın oluşturulmasında önemli bir rol oynayabilmektedir. İkinci olarak, bilim ve teknoloji parkları, firmalara bu parkları barındıran üniversite ve diğer araştırma kuruluşlarıyla da ilişkiler kurmaları yönünde fırsat sağlamaktadır. Üniversiteler, bir yandan firmaların inovasyon kapasitelerini arttıracak değerli bilimsel bilgilerin kaynağıyken, öte yandan da firmalara, park dışındaki kuruluşlarla bağlantı kurma ve yeni bilgilere ve kaynaklara erişme olanakları sunmaktadır. Gerek firmalar arasındaki, gerek firmalar ve üniversite arasındaki bu ilişki dinamikleri, bilim ve teknoloji parklarının inovasyon kapasitelerini etkileyen en temel etken olarak ele alınmalıdır.Anahtar kelimeler: teknopark, inovasyon, firma-firma ilişkileri, firma-üniversite ilişkileri JEL kodu: O30 RELATIONSHIP DYNAMICS IN TECHNOPARKS AS SEEDBEDS OF INNOVATION Abstract:Innovation is today widely acknowledged as the driving force of economic development and growth of regions and nations. Thus, policies promoting innovation activities have become popular among industrial policy makers of all countries in the world. Science and technology parks (technoparks), following the successful examples such as Silicon Valley, are one of these policies putting forward the regional dimension of new knowledge creating activities. This study analyzes the extent to which geographical proximity facilitates the collaborative and innovative relationships among firms and university located in these parks. Firstly, it is important to understand that being closely located isn't enough to stimulate collaborative 1 Yrd. Doç. Dr., Beykent Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi, aysecagli@beykent.edu.tr

show abstract

Section: Popüler Bir Inovasyon Politikası Aracı: Teknoparklarunclassified

Section: Teknoparklarda Firmalar Ve üNiversite Arasındaki Ilişkilerunclassified

İnovasyon Beşi̇ği̇ Teknoparklarda İli̇şki̇ Di̇nami̇kleri̇

Döner¹

2016

kuiibf

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Science parks (SP) are believed to have many value added contributions towards firms (Fukugawa 2006), especially focusing on providing the opportunities (close geographical proximity) and support (from the science park management) to their on-park firms to establishing knowledge linkages and allowing on-park firms to engage in joint research. Firms that have longer duration in a science park are considered to receive more of such benefits than those who are late comers in the park.…”

Section: Years Of Location In Science Parksmentioning

confidence: 99%

Knowledge exchange behaviours of science park firms: the innovation hub case

Chan

Oerlemans

Pretorius

2010

Technology Analysis & Strategic Management

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Knowledge exchange behaviours of science park firmsChan, K.Y.; Oerlemans, Leon; Pretorius, M.W. General rightsCopyright and moral rights for the publications made accessible in the public portal are retained by the authors and/or other copyright owners and it is a condition of accessing publications that users recognise and abide by the legal requirements associated with these rights.-Users may download and print one copy of any publication from the public portal for the purpose of private study or research -You may not further distribute the material or use it for any profit-making activity or commercial gain -You may freely distribute the URL identifying the publication in the public portal Take down policyIf you believe that this document breaches copyright, please contact us providing details, and we will remove access to the work immediately and investigate your claim. This article may be used for research, teaching and private study purposes. Any substantial or systematic reproduction, re-distribution, re-selling, loan or sub-licensing, systematic supply or distribution in any form to anyone is expressly forbidden.The publisher does not give any warranty express or implied or make any representation that the contents will be complete or accurate or up to date. The accuracy of any instructions, formulae and drug doses should be independently verified with primary sources. The publisher shall not be liable for any loss, actions, claims, proceedings, demand or costs or damages whatsoever or howsoever caused arising directly or indirectly in connection with or arising out of the use of this material.Technology Analysis & Strategic Management Vol. 22, No. 2, February 2010, 207-228 Knowledge exchange behaviours of science park firms: the innovation hub case This paper regards the knowledge flows between firms located on a science park as a type of network behaviour and answers three research questions: (1) What are the knowledge exchange behaviours of on-park firms? (2) Can we distinguish different types of behaviour among these firms?, and if so, (3) What are differences between these groups? We take a relational approach in which actor and relationship features are studied in a sample of firms located at the Innovation Hub (South Africa). Results show that there are two groups of firms: on-park firms that network with other on-park firms (Group 1) and those that do not (Group 0). Compared with Group 0, Group 1 has more informal ties with off-park firms; is able to gain more useful knowledge from private knowledge sources; and has more access to unintended knowledge that flows in the park. However, the innovative performance of the groups does not differ.

show abstract

“…Impressed by the success stories of role models like Silicon Valley, Boston (USA), Technopolis (Japan), Cambridge (UK), Sofia-Antipolis (France), Oulu-Tampere (Finland) and many others, science parks have received a lot of attention from academics and policy makers, aiming at creating wealth and employment in their region (Gibb, 1985). Science parks are especially popular in Asian countries such as Japan (Bass, 1998;Fukugawa, 2006), Taiwan (Tsai, 2005;Chen, 2006), China (Hu, 2007), Singapore (Mae Phillips and Yeung, 2003), Korea (Shin, 2001), Philippines (Macdonald and Joseph, 2001), and others (Yeoh et al, 2005).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Technology transfer as a driver for location of R&D active firms on science parks

Spithoven

2015

IJIRD

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:In a knowledge-based economy R&D activities are central. Since knowledge is more distributed, the need for networking between agents becomes essential. In innovation systems, all actors interact to source external knowledge, posing new challenges to science parks' missions. Networking leads to a new interpretation of the supporting role of science parks. Networking activities are largely localised and create hotspots for innovative activities. Science parks are among the most tangible strategic projects in science policy. This paper sheds light on the extent to which science parks help to favour technology transfer. Using firm level data, the role of science parks is screened. Especially high tech service companies are located on science parks, as are firms that deploy activities that are information intensive and science based. On-park firms refer to a larger extent to technology transfer linked drivers for their location, compared to off-park firms.

show abstract

Science parks in Japan and their value-added contributions to new technology-based firms

Cited by 148 publications

References 57 publications

İnovasyon Beşi̇ği̇ Teknoparklarda İli̇şki̇ Di̇nami̇kleri̇

İnovasyon Beşi̇ği̇ Teknoparklarda İli̇şki̇ Di̇nami̇kleri̇

Knowledge exchange behaviours of science park firms: the innovation hub case

Technology transfer as a driver for location of R&D active firms on science parks

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About