2021
DOI: 10.1177/00111287211005396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School Punishment, Deterrence, and Race: A Partial Test of Defiance Theory

Abstract: Rather than serving as a deterrent, exclusionary discipline tends to lead to a host of short and long-term negative outcomes. The mechanisms which propel students from exclusionary discipline toward these negative outcomes is understudied. The negative impact of school sanctions is particularly salient among students of color; yet the reasons for this are unclear. Informed by Sherman’s defiance theory, this study utilizes data from the National Longitudinal Study of Adolescent and Adult Health (Add Health) to … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although the literature specifically addressing racial/ethnic differences in the link between suspension and arrest is small and limited, adjacent research can also inform these processes. For instance, Pesta (2018Pesta ( , 2021 provided evidence that the link from suspension to secondary deviance (rather than sanctioning) is stronger for Black than for White students, but other research examining this relationship found no meaningful differences between Black and White students in the link between suspension or expulsion and future aggressive behavior (Jacobsen et al, 2019). Research outside of school settings has provided mixed evidence on the extent to which labeling operates differently across race/ethnicity among youth and young adults.…”
Section: Integrating Labeling Theory With Critical Race Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the literature specifically addressing racial/ethnic differences in the link between suspension and arrest is small and limited, adjacent research can also inform these processes. For instance, Pesta (2018Pesta ( , 2021 provided evidence that the link from suspension to secondary deviance (rather than sanctioning) is stronger for Black than for White students, but other research examining this relationship found no meaningful differences between Black and White students in the link between suspension or expulsion and future aggressive behavior (Jacobsen et al, 2019). Research outside of school settings has provided mixed evidence on the extent to which labeling operates differently across race/ethnicity among youth and young adults.…”
Section: Integrating Labeling Theory With Critical Race Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Perhaps, males are more apt to view the punishment as unfair or unjust and rather than accepting the legitimacy of the sanction, rebuffs it and the authority which enforced it. Recent research found racial differences in the perception of teacher fairness (Pesta, 2021); it may be that gender differences exist as well. Other research demonstrates that females are more likely to accept the punishment and experience shame rather than defiance and therefore may work to regain their feminine identity which is at odds with labels such as "delinquent" and "troublemaker" (Fitch & Nazaretian, 2019).…”
Section: Can a Labeling Via School Bond Perspective Explain Gender Di...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This teacher-side escalation is more severe when teachers interact with Black students, suggesting that daily discipline disparities might also escalate over time. Research evaluating students’ reactions to discipline also suggests that students who are disciplined can become defiant ( 24 , 25 ), which could lead to increases in acts of misbehavior and discipline escalation. Indeed, a detailed propensity score matching analysis suggested that discipline led students to increase their rates of misbehavior ( 5 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%