1979
DOI: 10.1080/0305764790090213
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

School‐Focused INSET Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

1983
1983
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recent work has explored approaches to and evaluation of in-service provision in general, and the 'teacher as researcher' concept in particular (Evans, 1980(Evans, , 1981Nixon, 1981;Alexander, 1980;McCabe, 1980;Henderson, 1978Henderson, , 1979Bolam, 1979;Topping and Brindle, 1979;Rudduck, 1981;Burgess, 1978;Bailey and Braithwaite, 1980;Ingvarson, 1979;T. P. Olsen, 1982;Keast and Carr, 1979;Pyle and Sayers, 1980;Baker, 1979;Bridges and Lah, 1982).…”
Section: Background To the Investigation And Methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Recent work has explored approaches to and evaluation of in-service provision in general, and the 'teacher as researcher' concept in particular (Evans, 1980(Evans, , 1981Nixon, 1981;Alexander, 1980;McCabe, 1980;Henderson, 1978Henderson, , 1979Bolam, 1979;Topping and Brindle, 1979;Rudduck, 1981;Burgess, 1978;Bailey and Braithwaite, 1980;Ingvarson, 1979;T. P. Olsen, 1982;Keast and Carr, 1979;Pyle and Sayers, 1980;Baker, 1979;Bridges and Lah, 1982).…”
Section: Background To the Investigation And Methods Usedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Products were classified as stars, cash cows, question marks or dogs. The analysis guided organisations to allocate most funds to developing their stars, maintaining investment in their cash cows, allocating some venture capital to the question marks and divesting themselves of their dogs (Mintzberg, Ahlstrand & Lampel 2005;Henderson 1979). …”
Section: Positioning Schoolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, there are dangers intrinsic to the exclusive use of any one system for development, for it runs the risk of being limited to either the confirmation of existing prejudices, the sharing of ignorance or discipleship of some charismatic, influential individual. If we rely only on our own perceptions of need, relevance and worth, without taking into account the limitations of our own perceptions and socialisation (what Skilbeck calls 'localism, parochialism and conservatism' (Skilbeck, 1984), then SBCD may become predictable, parochial (Henderson, 1979) and inbred. Without cross-fertilization with teachers in other schools, and without access to new ideas or 'critical friends' from outside as well as inside the school, there may be insufficient ideas of quality and impact.…”
Section: Uk: England and Walesmentioning
confidence: 99%