2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2009.03.021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scholar-participated governance as an alternative solution to the problem of collective action in social–ecological systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
1

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
2
29
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Scholars can be entrepreneurs for farmers, local communities, businesses, and other social actors (Olson 1971;Yang 2007a;Yang and Wu 2009). This study found that although both local scholars and outside scholars may be able to help, it is only local scholars who can be most effective.…”
Section: Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Scholars can be entrepreneurs for farmers, local communities, businesses, and other social actors (Olson 1971;Yang 2007a;Yang and Wu 2009). This study found that although both local scholars and outside scholars may be able to help, it is only local scholars who can be most effective.…”
Section: Principlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although scholars also play an important role in resolving collective action dilemmas in various fields, including combating desertification (Yang 2007a(Yang , 2007bYang and Wu 2009), the functions of scholars as a group of independent social actors and the mechanisms of scholars' participation have received little attention in the mainstream discourse concerning contemporary desertification control. Addressing these problems is particularly crucial for sustainable development in arid and semiarid regions around the world, which is the primary goal of our study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the businesses' participation in combating desertification in the secondary action group has recently become increasing important, though citizens' participation and government support were also crucial to the success of institutional change. Furthermore, in addition to the aforementioned scholar-groups, governments, citizens, and firms, many case study researchers (Hukkinen, 1998;Yang, 2007aYang, , 2007bYang, , 2009Yang, , 2010Yang and Wu, 2009;Lan, 2010a, 2010b) have emphasized the importance of households, clans, religious groups, NGOs, media and international organizations in combating desertification and environmental management.…”
Section: Rule 4: Collaboration Among Multiple Organizations Is Importmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This was determined based on the combination of our field data and the meta-analysis of existing data in the literature on the use of both indigenous and scientific knowledge (indigenous knowledge refers to the longstanding culture, traditions, wisdom, teaching, and practices in local communities, which are mainly orally passed for generations from person to person; while scientific knowledge are often generated by scholars or experts from universities, research institutions and private firms) and the participation of scholars. For instance, we defined scholars as those who had comparative advantages in knowledge over other social actors (e.g., farmers and government officials), including professors, scientists, researchers, experts, local technicians and any stakeholders who possess learned knowledge (Yang and Wu, 2009), >50% of the survey respondents in the seven counties indicated that scholarly participation in combating desertification was important (Table 2a). Whether scholarly participation was beneficial or not to desertification control, scholars and their knowledge indeed played a significant role in the institutional change related to combating desertification.…”
Section: Significance Of Scholars and Knowledge In Institutional Changementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation