1956
DOI: 10.1136/jech.10.3.107
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Schizophrenia: A Prognostic and Social Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

1961
1961
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Harris, Linker, Norris, and Shepherd (1956) found that the total duration of stay in hospital for their group of schizophrenic patients was closely correlated with the patients' condition at follow-up (after 5 years), and they concluded that statistical studies, in which prognosis is assessed by duration of stay, give a reliable assessment of outcome. If this is so, it is one more reason to suppose that prognosis is directly related to social class.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Harris, Linker, Norris, and Shepherd (1956) found that the total duration of stay in hospital for their group of schizophrenic patients was closely correlated with the patients' condition at follow-up (after 5 years), and they concluded that statistical studies, in which prognosis is assessed by duration of stay, give a reliable assessment of outcome. If this is so, it is one more reason to suppose that prognosis is directly related to social class.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2. The association between destination social status and mental disorder for the Harris et al (1956) data is borderline (X2 = 6.13; df = 2; p= .05).…”
Section: Which Models Fit?mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As Table 1 shows, their modified model does not fit the Midtown Manhattan data (L2=277.24;df=4; p=<.OO1) or any other data set except the Harris et al (1956) data.2 Their modified model, by the absence of TjkDG and Tijk7DG, assumes that destination social status and mental disorder are independent and that social mobility does not vary between groups. Which of these assumptions prevents their modified model from fitting the observed data in any of the data sets except the Harris et al (1956) data?…”
Section: Which Models Fit?mentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations