2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.future.2019.09.039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling Internet of Things requests to minimize latency in hybrid Fog–Cloud​ computing

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
96
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 176 publications
(96 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
96
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Many efforts were addressed addressing the communication and interoperability problems caused by the information silos arising from the diversity of the IoT system in the field of Electronic Health Records. Aburukba et al [159] emphasized that fog computing having a small communication delay, and when compared to the latency deployment feature of cloud and fog computing technologies, cloud computing has high communication latency deployment. Jaleel et al [160] proposed a novel framework that integrates cloud, edge, and fog computing technologies in order to provide interoperability and optimal bounded requirements.…”
Section: Remote Services Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many efforts were addressed addressing the communication and interoperability problems caused by the information silos arising from the diversity of the IoT system in the field of Electronic Health Records. Aburukba et al [159] emphasized that fog computing having a small communication delay, and when compared to the latency deployment feature of cloud and fog computing technologies, cloud computing has high communication latency deployment. Jaleel et al [160] proposed a novel framework that integrates cloud, edge, and fog computing technologies in order to provide interoperability and optimal bounded requirements.…”
Section: Remote Services Layermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Aburukba et al [43] study on the optimization of weighted sum of all request delays with deadline constraints in IoTedge-cloud environments to allocate an edge-cloud resource (processor) for each task's execution. They formulate the optimization problem as a Mixed Integer Linear Programming (MILP) problem which is NP-Hard, and propose a genetic algorithm to solve the MILP problem, where each gene represents a map between a task and an edge-cloud resource.…”
Section: ) All Offloading A: Response Time Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, a new architecture needs to be considered, due to the following reasons: Latency: many IoT applications interacted with the real environment through sensing and actuation, which makes these applications latency-critical applications, such as e-health applications. Integrating IoT applications with cloud computing alone is not enough due to the distance of cloud computing resources of IoT devices, therefore, integrating cloud with edge computing solves this issue as discussed in the next subsection [ 44 , 45 ]. Data size: the increasing number of IoT devices means more bandwidth needed to transmit IoT data to the cloud especially when smartphones are capable to send streaming videos and photos to the cloud, which leads to bringing cloud-like services near to the end-user to reduce the bandwidth required to transmit IoT data [ 46 ].…”
Section: Key Survey Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Latency: many IoT applications interacted with the real environment through sensing and actuation, which makes these applications latency-critical applications, such as e-health applications. Integrating IoT applications with cloud computing alone is not enough due to the distance of cloud computing resources of IoT devices, therefore, integrating cloud with edge computing solves this issue as discussed in the next subsection [ 44 , 45 ].…”
Section: Key Survey Topicsmentioning
confidence: 99%