2010 IEEE Energy Conversion Congress and Exposition 2010
DOI: 10.1109/ecce.2010.5618246
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scheduling demand response events with constraints on total number of events per year

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Dominion Virginia Power fixes 25 times per year as a CPP period. Each time is about 5 hours 21 . CPP highlights some periods of the year, in which the price is higher compared to the rest.…”
Section: Dynamic Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, Dominion Virginia Power fixes 25 times per year as a CPP period. Each time is about 5 hours 21 . CPP highlights some periods of the year, in which the price is higher compared to the rest.…”
Section: Dynamic Pricingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These considerations, along with the availability of cheaper communication and control technologies, suggest that the provision of flexibility by the demand side might be a viable alternative [6]. Tyagi et al showed that the optimal scheduling of DSM during critical price periods, particularly thermal loads, results in a significant reduction in the need for flexible generation units [7]. Kowli and Gross demonstrated using a security-constrained unit commitment that introducing DSM would reduce both load curtailment (and the corresponding losses of profit or comfort) and the need for investments in grid reinforcements [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal scheduling of DSM during critical price periods, particularly thermal loads, was explored in [7], resulting in a significant reduction in the need for flexible generation units. Using a securityconstrained unit commitment approach, [8] showed that introducing DSM would reduce both load curtailment (and the corresponding losses of profit or comfort) and the need for investments in grid reinforcements.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%