2003
DOI: 10.1029/2002rs002858
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering simulation for inhomogeneous layered canopy and random targets beneath canopies by using the Mueller matrix solution of the pulse radiative transfer

Abstract: The Mueller matrix solution of vector radiative transfer for inhomogeneous random media of nonspherical scatterers under a pulse incidence is presented. Copolarized and cross‐polarized bistatic scattering echoes can be numerically simulated. Temporally varying echoes well demonstrate volumetric and surface scattering mechanism and depict the inhomogeneous fraction profile of random scatterers. The effective height of inhomogeneous canopy inverted from the pulse echoes is discussed. Pulse echo patterns are also… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(37 reference statements)
1
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be seen that (11) presents coupling of different polarizations and is not exactly equivalent to (6a). However, under the condition that the horizontal orientation of random particles are uniform, four polarizations can be treated as thoroughly independent, and the upper-left four elements of or are then written as (this conclusion is demonstrated in Section V) (12) Apparently, (12) agrees with (6), which well proves the consistency between the model of system response function and the Mueller matrix solution.…”
Section: B Consistence Between the System Response Function And Muelsupporting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…It can be seen that (11) presents coupling of different polarizations and is not exactly equivalent to (6a). However, under the condition that the horizontal orientation of random particles are uniform, four polarizations can be treated as thoroughly independent, and the upper-left four elements of or are then written as (this conclusion is demonstrated in Section V) (12) Apparently, (12) agrees with (6), which well proves the consistency between the model of system response function and the Mueller matrix solution.…”
Section: B Consistence Between the System Response Function And Muelsupporting
confidence: 51%
“…From (7) and (8), the response waves evaluated by the Mueller matrix agree with the form that the input excitation convolutes with the system response function. Furthermore, the special functions, i.e., the rectangular function in (7) and the delta function in (8), also agree with those in the system response function (6). Comparing (6) with (7) and (8), the convoluted functions and denote, correspondingly, the responses of the particle layer and the underlying surface in the whole system response function.…”
Section: B Consistence Between the System Response Function And Muelmentioning
confidence: 80%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We developed an iterative approach to take account of high-order scattering and emission from densely distributed multi-layered scatters. (Jin and Chen, 2003;Jin and Liang, 2004b) The inverse problem of VRT is to retrieve the characteristic parameters of the objects from the observed radiance, e.g. scatter size, dielectric property, layer thickness, etc.…”
Section: -D Vrtmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(1). The co-polarized and cross-polarized backscattering coefficients, σ c and σ x , polarization degree m s for scattered Stokes echo with partial polarization and other functions can be numerically calculated [26].…”
Section: Model Of Vegetation Canopy and Mueller Matrix Solutionmentioning
confidence: 99%