1962
DOI: 10.1364/josa.52.000896
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattering and Extinction Coefficients for Small Absorbing and Nonabsorbing Aerosols*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For media where the diameters of any scattering particles are significantly smaller than the wavelength of the radiation, Rayleigh scattering theory describes the radiation particle interaction. Limits on when Rayleigh scattering theory is appropriate are found in [98][99][100]. Diffraction theory may be used to predict scattering due to large spherical particles.…”
Section: Implementing Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For media where the diameters of any scattering particles are significantly smaller than the wavelength of the radiation, Rayleigh scattering theory describes the radiation particle interaction. Limits on when Rayleigh scattering theory is appropriate are found in [98][99][100]. Diffraction theory may be used to predict scattering due to large spherical particles.…”
Section: Implementing Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The connection between Q ext and these parameters lies beyond the scope of this work. The relations and approximations assigned to this factor are widely dealt with in the literature [15,16]. However, its limit tends toward 2 for large values of α (the field of application of Fraunhofer),…”
Section: Size Porosity and Density Of The Flocs Obtained By Laser Dmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If a single wavelength is used, the value for the extinction coefficient must be known a priori and is based on the complex index of refraction of a soot particle, or (n -ik). Measurements for the extinction coefficient of soot particles are available, but there has been much controversy over the proper value (Charalampopoulos and Chang, 1988;Lee and Tien, 1981;Penndorf, 1962; among others). Simmons and Williams (1988) have shown that the Lee and Tien (1981) value is adequate for a wide range of shock tube conditions and fuels.…”
Section: Background Searchmentioning
confidence: 99%