2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117437
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattered slice SHARD reconstruction for motion correction in multi-shell diffusion MRI

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
59
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
3

Relationship

7
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
0
59
0
Order By: Relevance
“…All fetal brain images were reviewed and reported by an experienced perinatal neuroradiologist as showing appropriate appearances with no evidence of brain injury and/or malformation. Each subject was processed using the dHCP preprocessing pipeline, which includes specific measures to account for the existence of unpredictable fetal motion, geometric distortion of echo planar imaging, signal intensity inhomogeneities caused by differences in fetal position, and poor signal to noise ratio due to the small size of the fetal head and its distance from the coil (36,37). Of the total 151 subjects that were manually assessed, 38 subjects failed due to excessive motion during acquisition (details of quality checking criteria presented in SI Appendix, section 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All fetal brain images were reviewed and reported by an experienced perinatal neuroradiologist as showing appropriate appearances with no evidence of brain injury and/or malformation. Each subject was processed using the dHCP preprocessing pipeline, which includes specific measures to account for the existence of unpredictable fetal motion, geometric distortion of echo planar imaging, signal intensity inhomogeneities caused by differences in fetal position, and poor signal to noise ratio due to the small size of the fetal head and its distance from the coil (36,37). Of the total 151 subjects that were manually assessed, 38 subjects failed due to excessive motion during acquisition (details of quality checking criteria presented in SI Appendix, section 1).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For visualisation of single-subject data, the data ‘sub-CC00083XX10/ses-30900’ was used as it has clearly visible stripe patterns. This baby’s postmenstrual age (PMA) at scan is 42 weeks and the image lies in the 59th percentile quality score estimated from the motion and outlier weights (40). To create a population-average template from representative data, we randomly selected 32 subjects from 38 to 42 weeks PMA that have quality assessment scores above the 20th percentile (see figure 10).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dMRI data was processed using a motion correction and reconstruction algorithm (MCR) with integrated slice-to-volume reconstruction (SVR) (40). In brief, the reconstruction is based on an iterative estimation of a data-driven multi-shell low-rank (model-free) data representation (SHARD), slice outlier estimation, and rigid registration algorithm (41).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Datasets were acquired on a 3T Philips Achieva scanner equipped with a dedicated 32-channel neonatal head coil and baby transportation system (Hughes et al, 2017). The multi-shell HARDI volumes were acquired with four phase-encode directions on four shells with b-values of 0, 400, 1000 and 2600 s/mm 2 with TE 90 ms, TR 3800 ms (Hutter et al, 2018;Tournier et al, 2020) with 1.5 × 1.5 × 3 mm resolution and 1.5 mm slice overlap and reconstructed to 1.5 mm isotropic resolution using the SHARD pipeline (Christiaens et al, 2021). The structural T2w volumes were acquired using a TSE sequence with TR 12 s, TE 156 ms.…”
Section: Cohort Datasets and Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%