1965
DOI: 10.1148/85.3.546
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scattered Radiation in a Phantom from Diagnostic Quality Radiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1972
1972
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since it is well known that x-ray tube leakage is low, it was not specifically investigated. Scatter by air was assumed to be negligible 10 and preliminary measurements demonstrated that image receptor scatter was negligible. Finally, accessory radiation shields were not considered in this work and were, therefore, removed from all systems tested.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Since it is well known that x-ray tube leakage is low, it was not specifically investigated. Scatter by air was assumed to be negligible 10 and preliminary measurements demonstrated that image receptor scatter was negligible. Finally, accessory radiation shields were not considered in this work and were, therefore, removed from all systems tested.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Physical radiation protection practices in interventional radiology and cardiology are predicated on the tenet that occupational radiation exposure is primarily due to scatter from the patient . However, as early as 1965, Trout and Kelley characterized the contributions of scatter originating from x‐ray beam spectral filters, collimators, and the collimator assembly cover to a patient‐simulating phantom . In 2004, McVey et al used Monte Carlo simulation to estimate scatter originating from within a simulated air kerma‐area product (KAP) meter .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation