2016
DOI: 10.1051/matecconf/20166105019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scarf Repair of Composite Laminates

Abstract: Abstract. The use of composite materials, such as carbon-fiber reinforced plastic (CFRP) composites, aerostructures has led to an increased need of advanced assembly joining and repair technologies. Adhesive bonded repairs as an alternative to recover full or part of initial strength were investigated. Tests were conducted with the objective of evaluating the effectiveness of techniques used for repairing damage fiber reinforced laminated composites. Failure loads and failure modes were generated and compared … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This result is supported by previous similar studies. According to Zonghong et al 14 scarfed the samples produced from carbon fiber fabric prepreg at 2°, 4°, and 6° angles and used external plies for repair. As a result of the study, it was observed that the failure strength value of the 2° scarf repaired sample was higher than the others.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This result is supported by previous similar studies. According to Zonghong et al 14 scarfed the samples produced from carbon fiber fabric prepreg at 2°, 4°, and 6° angles and used external plies for repair. As a result of the study, it was observed that the failure strength value of the 2° scarf repaired sample was higher than the others.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, adhesively bonded single scarf with 20°seems to be more suitable solution for a quick and durable but also reliable repair, as it is easy to apply and also does not need to create a large scarf area as compared with previous low scarf angle studies in the literature. 5,11,13,[14][15][16]…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%