2010
DOI: 10.1134/s1027451010050186
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning helium ion microscope: Distribution of secondary electrons and ion channeling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…28 The number and energy distribution of these ion induced secondary electrons differs from what is found in a SEM. A sharper maximum at lower energies is usually found 38,39 in HIM. In Fig.…”
Section: Secondary Electronsmentioning
confidence: 95%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…28 The number and energy distribution of these ion induced secondary electrons differs from what is found in a SEM. A sharper maximum at lower energies is usually found 38,39 in HIM. In Fig.…”
Section: Secondary Electronsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…This allows for two additional contrast mechanisms in HIM. The well known channeling contrast 31,39 can be exploited to obtain the crystal orientation of samples with a large lateral resolution. 46 This technique makes use of calculations of the blocked area fraction, which yields results similar to stereographic projections of channeling minima or Laue back reflection patterns.…”
Section: Backscattered Heliummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A beam spot size of the HIM is 0.25 nm, and a maximum distribution of secondary electrons energy was about 1 eV [4], so it is expected that the helium ion beam deposition brings about tungsten particles of less than a few nm diameter without any deposition at the periphery of a focused area due to secondary electrons of higher energy than a few eV which is generated in the gallium ion case. Figure 1a shows a SEM image of a tungsten nanoparticle and cross lines deposited on a Si substrate and an enlarged STEM image of the nanoparticle in fig.…”
Section: -8569 Japanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many differences exist between these two imaging techniques as a direct result of the different beam-sample interactions occurring. At the typical acceleration voltage of 30 kV the HIM produces secondary electrons (SE) with a very low energy distribution [2]. These electrons can only escape from the top few nanometres of a sample [3], resulting in very surface sensitive imaging [4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%