2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11340-007-9041-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning Electron Microscopy for Quantitative Small and Large Deformation Measurements Part II: Experimental Validation for Magnifications from 200 to 10,000

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
129
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 185 publications
(131 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
129
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The difference in the measured strain values is related to the errors associated with the DIC and the microgrid techniques. These are: a) the uncertainty in pinpointing the deformed grids intersections to measure the strain distribution, E G , b) errors due to beam shift in electron microscopy [28,29], E B and c) the errors associated with the correlation algorithms in DIC [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The difference in the measured strain values is related to the errors associated with the DIC and the microgrid techniques. These are: a) the uncertainty in pinpointing the deformed grids intersections to measure the strain distribution, E G , b) errors due to beam shift in electron microscopy [28,29], E B and c) the errors associated with the correlation algorithms in DIC [34].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8 shows the resulting strain map with a maximum absolute strain value of 0.004, which is negligible compared to the strain values recorded during the test. This is likely to be due to the magnification selected to record the images, which is relatively low (about 500X) as the lower the magnification, the smaller the beam shift and consequently the smaller the error in strain measurement [28,29]. Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The map also shows a linear pattern which highlights a second type of error corresponding to the drift of the SEM electron beam during irradiation. Errors due to electron beam shift [34,35] are included in the overall values shown in Fig. 6(b) but they have been shown to be very small in magnitude, up to 0.4 %, as reported in [36], using Digital Image Correlation for strain analysis and the SEM used in this study.…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Most of these works address the calibration of the projection and the distortion, and has very little to do with the calibration of drift. According to Cornille (2005) and Sutton et al (2006Sutton et al ( , 2007 the pixel drift is estimated by the disparity between pairs of points and is fitted by B-splines w.r.t time. This model is used to estimate the drift and to remove it in real time.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%