2014
DOI: 10.1177/2041731414552114
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning electron microscopical observation of an osteoblast/osteoclast co-culture on micropatterned orthopaedic ceramics

Abstract: In biomaterial engineering, the surface of an implant can influence cell differentiation, adhesion and affinity towards the implant. On contact with an implant, bone marrow–derived mesenchymal stromal cells demonstrate differentiation towards bone forming osteoblasts, which can improve osteointegration. The process of micropatterning has been shown to improve osteointegration in polymers, but there are few reports surrounding ceramics. The purpose of this study was to establish a co-culture of bone marrow–deri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Further studies reported the use of porcine co-cultures of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and bone marrow haematopoetic cells (BMHCs)16, or of human co-cultures of BMSC and CD34 + BMHC17 or MSC and PBMCs18. We recently developed a methodology to allow mesenchymal bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC)/bone marrow haematopoetic cell (BMHC) co-cultures that could form mature osteoblasts and osteoclasts in culture in response to materials1920. Further, we have illustrated that nanoscale topography in polymers19 and in titanium can present positive osteogenic cues while osteoclastogenesis remains unchanged; i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further studies reported the use of porcine co-cultures of bone marrow stromal cells (BMSCs) and bone marrow haematopoetic cells (BMHCs)16, or of human co-cultures of BMSC and CD34 + BMHC17 or MSC and PBMCs18. We recently developed a methodology to allow mesenchymal bone marrow stromal cell (BMSC)/bone marrow haematopoetic cell (BMHC) co-cultures that could form mature osteoblasts and osteoclasts in culture in response to materials1920. Further, we have illustrated that nanoscale topography in polymers19 and in titanium can present positive osteogenic cues while osteoclastogenesis remains unchanged; i.e.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Osteoblasts are derived from mesenchymal stromal cells, which are responsible for bone matrix synthesis and subsequent mineralization (12). Chronic persistent inflammation inhibits bone formation and osteoblast differentiation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, a surface roughness of the zirconia disk did not show any difference with that of the Ti disk. Considering that the surface topography of materials contributed to differences in osteoclast behavior in previous reports [ 37 , 38 , 39 ], the surface roughness did not affect cellular responses in a comparison between the zirconia and Ti surfaces. We also showed that zirconia and Ti disks were pure and contained no contaminants using EDS.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%