1 This study investigates the effects of androgens, the antiandrogen flutamide and green tea catechins on glucose transport inhibition in human erythrocytes. These effects may relate to the antidiabetogenic effects of green tea. 2 Testosterone, 4-androstene-3,17-dione, dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) and DHEA-3-acetate inhibit glucose exit from human erythrocytes with half-maximal inhibitions (K i ) of 39.278.9, 29.673.7, 48.1710.2 and 4.870.98 mM, respectively. The antiandrogen flutamide competitively relieves these inhibitions and of phloretin. Dehydrotestosterone has no effect on glucose transport, indicating the differences between androgen interaction with GLUT1 and human androgen receptor (hAR). 3 Green tea catechins also inhibit glucose exit from erythrocytes. Epicatechin 3-gallate (ECG) has a K i ECG of 0.1470.01 mM, and epigallocatechin 3-gallate (EGCG) has a K i EGCG of 0.9770.13 mM. Flutamide reverses these effects. 4 Androgen-screening tests show that the green tea catechins do not act genomically. The high affinities of ECG and EGCG for GLUT1 indicate that this might be their physiological site of action. 5 There are sequence homologies between GLUT1 and the ligand-binding domain (LBD) of hAR containing the amino-acid triads Arg 126, Thr 30 and Asn 288, and Arg 126, Thr 30 and Asn 29, with similar 3D topology to the polar groups binding 3-keto and 17-b OH steroid groups in hAR LBD. These triads are appropriately sited for competitive inhibition of glucose import at the external opening of the hydrophilic pore traversing GLUT1.
Background: The Integra Cadence total ankle replacement (TAR) is a fourth-generation anatomic, fixed-bearing implant requiring minimal tibial and talar resection, which has been in clinical use since June 2016. The primary purpose of this study is to assess its short-term clinical and radiographic outcomes after TAR using this prosthesis. Methods: This is a prospective case series of consecutive patients that underwent TAR using this novel fourth-generation prosthesis between June 2016 and November 2017. The primary outcome of interest was the Ankle Osteoarthritis Scale (AOS). Secondary outcomes included Short Form Health Survey–36 (SF-36) scores, radiographic alignment, complications, reoperations, and revisions. Results: In total, 69 patients were included in our study. Fifty-one patients (73.9%) required a total of 91 ancillary procedures. Postoperatively, AOS pain scores decreased significantly by an average of 17.8±30.1 points from 45.9±18.2 to 28.4±27.3 ( P < .001). AOS disability scores also decreased significantly following surgery by an average of 22.0±30.5 points from 53.9±18.5 to 32.5±27.9 ( P < .001). The SF-36 physical component summary score improved 10.4±9.8 points from 33.1±9.1 to 42.6±9.1 ( P < .001). Radiographic analysis demonstrated significant improvement to neutral coronal plane alignment, which was achieved in 97% of patients ( P < .01) with no cyst formation at 2 years. There was 1 reported complication, 9 reoperations, and no metal or polyethylene component revisions. Overall, the 2-year implant survivorship was 100% in our cohort. Eighteen patients (26.1%) demonstrated fibrous ingrowth of the tibial component. However, outcome scores for these patients did not demonstrate any negative effects. Conclusions: In our hands, this TAR system demonstrated excellent early clinical and radiographic outcomes. Patients reported improved physical health status, pain, and disability in the postoperative period. Total ankle instrumentation allowed for accurate and reproducible implantation with correction of coronal and sagittal plane deformities. Early results for the clinical use of this TAR system are promising, but further long-term prospective outcome studies are necessary. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.
The suspicion of a tumour should be raised in the patient with unremitting, unexplained, non-mechanical bony elbow pain. These echo the NICE recommendations and we recommend prompt specialist referral. With high rates of local recurrence, we recommend close postoperative monitoring.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.