Macromolecular Engineering 2007
DOI: 10.1002/9783527631421.ch44
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scanning Calorimetry

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 104 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The DSC heating scans of Figs. 1 and 2 showed that the glass transition of the MAF is not significantly broadened towards higher temperature, suggesting that the MAF and RAF should be considered as separate nanophases of different properties, and not parts of a single phase in which the restriction of the chain mobility is exponentially decreasing with the distance from the crystal surface [42,62]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The DSC heating scans of Figs. 1 and 2 showed that the glass transition of the MAF is not significantly broadened towards higher temperature, suggesting that the MAF and RAF should be considered as separate nanophases of different properties, and not parts of a single phase in which the restriction of the chain mobility is exponentially decreasing with the distance from the crystal surface [42,62]. Fig.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The DSC plot of plain PBS (magenta curve) shows a T g of −36 °C, with a c p -jump that points to a mobile amorphous content of w A = 0.22, as calculated by comparison the measured c p -step to the heat capacity step at T g of the fully amorphous polymer [37,44]. This is followed by a small endotherm peaked at 42 °C, coupled with a sizable increase of c p , and then by a broad endotherm, a sharp recrystallization, and a final melting peak.…”
Section: Results and Initial Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As an example of the effect of addition of a nucleating agent on the crystallization rate, in Figure 16 is plotted the crystallization peak time of nonnucleated iPP (squares) and iPP containing 500 ppm γ-quinacridone (diamond symbols) as a function of the crystallization temperature. [146] The data reveal increased crystallization rate of the nucleated iPP at temperatures higher than about 40 C, while at lower temperatures the nucleating agent is not effective in the sense that it can compete with the much higher number of homogeneous nuclei.…”
Section: Preservation Of Homogenoeus Nuclei On Heatingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…The POM micrographs at the right side in Figure 17 were taken after crystallization of samples of sheared PA 66 at 70 C (top image) and 200 C (bottom image in the FSC, still attached to the FIGURE 16 Crystallization peak times of nonnucleated (squares) and nucleated iPP (diamond symbols) as a function of the crystallization temperature (left). To the right are shown POM images obtained on nonnucleated (right column) and nucleated iPP (left column), after crystallization in an FSC at 30 C (top), 80 C (center), and 120 C (bottom) [146] substrate). Note again that the crystallization half-time of the sample crystallized at 70 C is of the order of magnitude of 10 seconds, while that of the sample crystallized at 200 C was 0.2-0.3 seconds.…”
Section: Preservation Of Homogenoeus Nuclei On Heatingmentioning
confidence: 99%