2019
DOI: 10.1002/ajoc.201800729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scandium(III)‐Catalysed Decarboxylative Addition of βKetoacids to para‐Quinone Methides: Evidence for 1,6‐Addition and Base‐Assisted Decarboxylation Tandem Process

Abstract: A catalytic tandem 1,6-addition/decarboxylation process of β-ketoacids and para-quinone methides under scandium triflate catalysis and subsequent triethylamine treatment has been developed. The 1 H NMR and ESI-HRMS experiments displayed direct evidences for the reaction pathway.[a] Dr.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recently, a large number of metal‐ and organocatalyzed conjugate addition reactions of p ‐quinone methides ( p ‐QMs) were reported [12,13] . Chiang and Lu reported the first example of Lewis acid catalyzed decarboxylative addition of β‐ketoacids to p ‐QMs through a tandem 1,6‐addition and decarboxylation pathway [14] . However, metal catalysts and bases are needed to promote the reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Recently, a large number of metal‐ and organocatalyzed conjugate addition reactions of p ‐quinone methides ( p ‐QMs) were reported [12,13] . Chiang and Lu reported the first example of Lewis acid catalyzed decarboxylative addition of β‐ketoacids to p ‐QMs through a tandem 1,6‐addition and decarboxylation pathway [14] . However, metal catalysts and bases are needed to promote the reaction.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…3‐(3,5‐Di‐ tert ‐butyl‐4‐hydroxyphenyl)‐3‐(4‐methoxyphenyl)‐1‐phenylpropan‐1‐one (3 h) [14] . White solid; 81% yield (38.6 mg); 1 H NMR (300 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 7.92 (d, J =7.5 Hz, 2H), 7.56–7.53 (m, 1H), 7.47–7.42 (m, 2H), 7.23–7.20 (d, J =8.1 Hz, 2H), 7.04 (s, 2H), 6.83 (d, J =8.1 Hz, 2H), 5.06 (s, 1H), 4.71 (t, J =7.2 Hz, 1H), 3.79 (s, 3H), 4.69–4.66 (m, 2H), 1.40 (s, 18H); 13 C NMR (75 MHz, CDCl 3 ) δ 199.0, 157.9, 152.1, 137.4, 136.7, 135.7, 135.0, 132.9, 128.8, 128.5, 128.1, 124.3, 113.8, 55.2, 45.7, 45.6, 34.3, 30.3.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations