2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2017.07.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling up sustainable energy innovations

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
97
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 123 publications
(110 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
97
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Studies of socio-technical transition have referred to upscaling from experiments most explicitly. They generally refer to upscaling from innovation experiments or projects as not only the growing level of adoption (as in diffusion studies), but also the changing social and institutional context, or, in their words, the growing alignment of technologies, actors and institutions (For the argument in this paper it is not productive to flesh out the slight differences in defining upscaling, such as between Kemp & Grin [12], the emergence of a set of new practices learned from practical experiments, with corresponding new structure and culture elements; Van den Bosch [13], all activities aimed at embedding the experiment in the structure, culture and practices at a higher scale level (the regime), or Naber et al [14], four types of upscaling: (1) growing (i.e., the experiment continues with more actors), (2) replication (on other locations), (3) accumulation (i.e., linking to other experiments), (4) transformation(i.e., the experiment shapes wider institutional change in the regime)). Transition studies have offered a wealth of cases of societal transformation, but to what extent do these elaborate how established socio-institutional contexts constrain upscaling from experiments?…”
Section: Conceptualizing Constraints On Upscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Studies of socio-technical transition have referred to upscaling from experiments most explicitly. They generally refer to upscaling from innovation experiments or projects as not only the growing level of adoption (as in diffusion studies), but also the changing social and institutional context, or, in their words, the growing alignment of technologies, actors and institutions (For the argument in this paper it is not productive to flesh out the slight differences in defining upscaling, such as between Kemp & Grin [12], the emergence of a set of new practices learned from practical experiments, with corresponding new structure and culture elements; Van den Bosch [13], all activities aimed at embedding the experiment in the structure, culture and practices at a higher scale level (the regime), or Naber et al [14], four types of upscaling: (1) growing (i.e., the experiment continues with more actors), (2) replication (on other locations), (3) accumulation (i.e., linking to other experiments), (4) transformation(i.e., the experiment shapes wider institutional change in the regime)). Transition studies have offered a wealth of cases of societal transformation, but to what extent do these elaborate how established socio-institutional contexts constrain upscaling from experiments?…”
Section: Conceptualizing Constraints On Upscalingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They translate lessons from local experiments into more generic knowledge and use it to frame and coordinate local projects (Geels and Raven, 2006). This concept of scaling-up is also known as broadening (Van den Bosch and Rotmans, 2008) or accumulation (Naber et al, 2017) and refers essentially to the idea of repeating a sustainability experiment in new contexts and linking it to other domains.…”
Section: Strategic Niche Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wieczorek [9] highlights that practical strategies of upscaling can include anchorage, translation, value creation or empowerment. According to Naber et al [20], little is known about how experiments scale up and which processes are important for the upscaling of experiments. A few exceptions exist [21,22].…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Upscaling Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…A few exceptions exist [21,22]. As a response to this lack, Naber et al [20] have developed a framework for determining sustainable innovation upscaling, and which we have usefully deployed in our analysis below.…”
Section: Theoretical Framework: Upscaling Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%