2017
DOI: 10.1515/yplm-2017-0007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling morphosemantic transparency/opacity: A corpus-linguistic and acquisitionist study of German diminutives

Abstract: The judicious use of electronic corpora allows new possibilities in the study of word formation. In contrast to the usual way of contrasting morphosemantic transparency (or compositionality) and morphosemantic opacity (or non-compositionality) in a dichotomous way, we present a ten-step scale from maximum transparency to total opacity, exemplified with the common German diminutive suffixation in -chen and Austro-Bavarian -erl.Our corpus-linguistic investigation allows new insights into problems of distribution… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
(18 reference statements)
0
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To these aims, the study proposes a scale of morphosemantic transparency/opacity for the analysis of compound constituents (cf. Schwaiger et al 2017 for German diminutives; a much smaller one by Talamo, Celata & Bertinetto 2016 for Italian derivatives). In particular, the compound constituents are analysed in connection with: 1) their degree of transparency (vs. opacity, including metaphorical/metonymic meaning), 2) their part-of-speech, and 3) their semantic contribution in the construction of the whole compound's meaning (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To these aims, the study proposes a scale of morphosemantic transparency/opacity for the analysis of compound constituents (cf. Schwaiger et al 2017 for German diminutives; a much smaller one by Talamo, Celata & Bertinetto 2016 for Italian derivatives). In particular, the compound constituents are analysed in connection with: 1) their degree of transparency (vs. opacity, including metaphorical/metonymic meaning), 2) their part-of-speech, and 3) their semantic contribution in the construction of the whole compound's meaning (cf.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The scale of morphosemantic transparency elaborated for the analysis of compound constituents is partially adapted from Schwaiger et al (2017). The authors have elaborated a scale of morphosemantic transparency/opacity for the analysis of German diminutives which is finer-grained and more realistic than the binary opposition between transparency and opacity used in the literature for compounds' representation and processing (e.g.…”
Section: Scale Of Morphosemantic Transparency (Vs Opacity)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Στο μέγεθος της σημασιολογικής αδιαφάνειας παρουσιάζονται διαβαθμίσεις και έτσι υπάρχουν σύνθετα απολύτως αδιαφανή (3α, β), η σημασία των οποίων απορρέει μόνο μεταφορικά από τα επιμέρους συστατικά τους (fully opaque), άλλα λιγότερο αδιαφανή (partially opaque) και άλλα περισσότερο διαφανή (3γ), εφόσον η σημασία του συνθέτου είναι κατανοητή με βάση τα επιμέρους συστατικά του (βλ. Jarema et al 1999, Libben et al 2003, Ξυδόπουλος 2008: 194, Bourque 2014, Körtvélyessy et al 2015,Lorenz & Zwitserlood 2016, Schwaiger et al 2017, Smolka & Libben 2017. Ορισμένα παραδείγματα στη Νέα Ελληνική είναι τα εξής (βλ.…”
Section: σημασιολογική διαφάνεια/αδιαφάνεια των συνθέτωνunclassified