2002
DOI: 10.1063/1.1462422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling effects on vertical-cavity surface-emitting lasers static and dynamic behavior

Abstract: Articles you may be interested inDifferential surface photovoltage spectroscopy characterization of a 1.3 μm InGaAlAs/InP vertical-cavity surfaceemitting laser structureWe investigate the influence of oxide aperture size and number of top distributed Bragg reflector pairs on the performance of oxide confined vertical-cavity surface emitting lasers. Several counteracting mechanisms are shown to result in nonmonotonic behavior, which limits the performance of very small cavities. Static, dynamic, and noise behav… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additionally, for a 4 µm aperture device, we see an increase in threshold current to 0.60 mA. This has been explained previously by an increased internal optical loss due to scattering at the oxide layers for small apertures [34][35][36], greater sidewall recombination as device diameter is reduced [17,37,38] and an increased internal temperature [28,39,40] driven by the increased series resistance of small aperture devices. The threshold currents for oxidised QF VCSELs are also plotted in Figure 2, and here we observe a minimum threshold current for a 6 µm aperture QF device, which increases to 2.9 and 4.6 mA for 4 and 18 µm aperture QF devices, respectively.…”
Section: Threshold Currentsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…Additionally, for a 4 µm aperture device, we see an increase in threshold current to 0.60 mA. This has been explained previously by an increased internal optical loss due to scattering at the oxide layers for small apertures [34][35][36], greater sidewall recombination as device diameter is reduced [17,37,38] and an increased internal temperature [28,39,40] driven by the increased series resistance of small aperture devices. The threshold currents for oxidised QF VCSELs are also plotted in Figure 2, and here we observe a minimum threshold current for a 6 µm aperture QF device, which increases to 2.9 and 4.6 mA for 4 and 18 µm aperture QF devices, respectively.…”
Section: Threshold Currentsupporting
confidence: 79%
“…The variation of I th is not much affected by r s : On the other hand, Figure 7 shows enhanced differential quantum efficiency when the diffusion coefficient increases, with significantly different behaviour for various spreading coefficients. It must be mentioned at this point that other effects, such as mirror and internal losses, gain or confinement factor also play an important role in determining the VCSELs' steady-state behaviour [26]. However, these effects are included in any simple rate equations model, and we will therefore insist on the role played by effects specific to the presented model.…”
Section: Application To the Analysis Of Diffusion Lossesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…With rapid development of wireless communication networks, there is also an increasing need for simple, power-efficient and cost-effective transmission and distribution of radio frequency signals over optical fibers [2]. A theoretical analysis of VCSEL laser generation process at 1550 nm was carried out in [2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10]. For this purpose, the non-linear Statz-DeMars equations have been studied.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To construct a theory for the dynamic processes under these conditions, it is necessary to improve the system of Statz-DeMars rate equations by adding the heat conduction equation with heat sources. The temperature model of VCSEL was described in works [2][3][4][5][6][7]. This model takes into account the effect of temperature increase in active domain depending on the injection current and the ambient temperature, and takes into account the temperature dependence of the gain, the pump current, and the barrier transparency.…”
Section: Review Of Previous Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation