2008 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems 2008
DOI: 10.1109/iros.2008.4651073
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling effects in multi-robot control

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…31 These studies are just a few examples of the works comparing workload levels as the human supervisor is tasked to deploy various numbers of robots. Many other research efforts 15,18,31,32,36,37 have reported similar results to the ones presented above, reinforcing the link between increased group size and heightened workload. Given that workload can only be increased up to a limit, it becomes evident that only a limited number of robots can be deployed by a single human supervisor.…”
Section: The Effects Of High Workloadsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…31 These studies are just a few examples of the works comparing workload levels as the human supervisor is tasked to deploy various numbers of robots. Many other research efforts 15,18,31,32,36,37 have reported similar results to the ones presented above, reinforcing the link between increased group size and heightened workload. Given that workload can only be increased up to a limit, it becomes evident that only a limited number of robots can be deployed by a single human supervisor.…”
Section: The Effects Of High Workloadsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Consequently, the supervisor would experience more workload with the addition of each robot. 14,[17][18][19][20] There is then a greater propensity for the supervisor to fail to perform critical tasks. 21 Awareness for the actions of robots, the status of each robot as well as their progress in fulfilling the mission objective is critical when deploying robots.…”
Section: The Cognitive Challenges In Multiple-robot Supervisionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the moment, real-life SAR operations have only a few, if any, robots assisting the rescue workers so there is significant potential for more extensive MRS utilization, especially for the critical first 48 hours after which the likelihood of finding survivors drops rapidly in disaster scenarios. Currently, there are on average two human operators per one robot in a typical SAR mission, but simulation tests have implied that up to eight to twelve robots can be operated by a single operator with good efficiency [2]. One of SHERPA's goals is indeed to increase this ratio and ERL Emergency could push the usage of MRS in actual SAR operations by somewhat shifting its focus to allow and encourage more robots per competition team.…”
Section: Final Thoughtsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors show that their participants' workload was significantly higher when they had to search for the bombs with nine robots compared to with six robots. Velagapudi et al (2008) conducted search and rescue experiments with 4, 8 and 12 simulated robots. The results of their experiments revealed that their participants' workload increased when the number of robots increased.…”
Section: Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%