2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.jag.2006.08.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scaling dimensions in spectroscopy of soil and vegetation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
25
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 133 publications
(147 reference statements)
0
25
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This can be explained because the FieldSpec data relate to reflectance measurements at the branch level, whereas reflectances derived from WorldView2 data relate to the canopy level. Clumping effects and internal shadowing inside the tree canopy cause lower NDVI values at the canopy level [50,51]. In spite of this, NDVI was linearly correlated to GCF showing an R 2 of 0.7 and a RMSE of 0.12.…”
Section: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (Ndvi)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…This can be explained because the FieldSpec data relate to reflectance measurements at the branch level, whereas reflectances derived from WorldView2 data relate to the canopy level. Clumping effects and internal shadowing inside the tree canopy cause lower NDVI values at the canopy level [50,51]. In spite of this, NDVI was linearly correlated to GCF showing an R 2 of 0.7 and a RMSE of 0.12.…”
Section: Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (Ndvi)mentioning
confidence: 97%
“…While Malenovsky et al (2007) discuss the topic in more detail, several approaches to bridge various scaling levels exist. Classical gaps can be identified in photonvegetation interaction, when scaling from leaf to canopy level and coupled (or linked) radiative transfer models (RTM) are used (c.f., Jacquemoud et al, 2009-in this issue).…”
Section: Bridging Scaling Gaps From Molecules To Ecosystems and Biomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As shown in the land cover map (Figure 2), the land covers on the Zoige Plateau are characterized by high spatial heterogeneity, especially in the transition zones between wetlands and grasslands. Although some researches demonstrated that the linearity assumption only leads to minor inaccuracies when NDVI is used instead of reflectance [28,63], because of the influence of adjacent targets [28], the mechanism of NDVI mixing is very complex and the linear unmixing assumption is probably not suitable for areas with a complex underlying surface [64,65]. Moreover, the error of the land cover map (about 10 percent) and image registration between data sources (different spatial resolution match between MODIS NDVI and TM-derived land cover map) can also introduce uncertainty into unmixing and subsequent LUE inversion.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%