1985
DOI: 10.3758/bf03211349
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale, key, and contour in the discrimination of tuned and mistuned approximations to melody

Abstract: Approximations to melody were synthesized using a computational technique whereby the occurrences of certain notes and intervals were made more probable than others. In experimental melodies, these notes and intervals were chosen to clarify the diatonic scale and the key of the melody. To clarify the scale of a melody, the probabilities of the diatonic scale notes were made higher than those of nonscale notes. Perception of these melodies was compared with control melodies in which the higher probabilities wer… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
18
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
3
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stimuli with lower tonal strength should have less similarity of tonality and thus should generate less confusion. Finally, the weaker the tonality, the less well remembered should be the melody, which agrees with Cuddy et al (1981) and Watkins (1985). Even contour should be less well remembered for the atonal melodies, in keeping with Bartlett and Dowling's (1988) result that contour changes were more difficult to recognize in atonal (vs. tonal) test melodies.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Stimuli with lower tonal strength should have less similarity of tonality and thus should generate less confusion. Finally, the weaker the tonality, the less well remembered should be the melody, which agrees with Cuddy et al (1981) and Watkins (1985). Even contour should be less well remembered for the atonal melodies, in keeping with Bartlett and Dowling's (1988) result that contour changes were more difficult to recognize in atonal (vs. tonal) test melodies.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…The order effects show that participants seem to have had greater trouble differentiating between sequences when the first sequence was a variant that departed more from the original (as in Bartlett & Dowling, 1988;Watkins, 1985). This pattern is especially notable in Figure 10, which depicts the main effects of comparing each time level manipulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…A useful way of controlling nonmusical artifacts is provided by Watkins (1985), who used series of tones with either tuned or mistuned melodic intervals to separate effects due to music-perceptual knowledge from more gen-RECOGNITION OF TONE SERIES 629 eral perceptual factors. "Tuned" tone series contain note frequencies based on the 12-tone equal temperamentthat is, the octave is divided into 12 equal semitones (the smallest interval) by the twelvefold division of the 2: 1 ratio of the octave.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mistuning as used by Watkins (1985) and in the present Experiments 3 and 4 can be explained as follows. The constant frequency ratio that relates the notes of adjacent semitones (called quantal intervals by Watkins, 1985) within equal-temperament tuning, can be described with the formula…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%