2019
DOI: 10.1002/qj.3524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale interactions and anisotropy in stable boundary layers

Abstract: Regimes of interactions between motions on different time‐scales are investigated in the FLOSSII dataset for nocturnal near‐surface stable boundary layer turbulence. The non‐stationary response of turbulent vertical velocity variance to non‐turbulent, submeso‐scale wind velocity variability is analysed using the bounded variation, finite element, vector autoregressive factor models (FEM‐BV‐VARX) clustering method. Several locally stationary flow regimes are identified with different influences of submeso wind … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
29
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
(87 reference statements)
0
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is intuitive since turbulence becomes more anisotropic in very stable conditions where the influence of sub‐mesoscale motions is also significant (cf. Stiperski and Calaf, ; Vercauteren et al ., ) or above the BL where geostrophic turbulence is two‐dimensional. In the initiation phase of the katabatic flow, these very stable conditions with anisotropic turbulence are found also very close to the ground as already observed by Banta ( ).…”
Section: Stable Boundary‐layer Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is intuitive since turbulence becomes more anisotropic in very stable conditions where the influence of sub‐mesoscale motions is also significant (cf. Stiperski and Calaf, ; Vercauteren et al ., ) or above the BL where geostrophic turbulence is two‐dimensional. In the initiation phase of the katabatic flow, these very stable conditions with anisotropic turbulence are found also very close to the ground as already observed by Banta ( ).…”
Section: Stable Boundary‐layer Heightmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Otherwise, the model would need more clusters. According to an earlier similar study (Vercauteren et al 2019a), the TKE exhibits a heavy tail distribution in the strongly stable regime. Consequently, taking the logarithm of the TKE, e t ≡ ln(e M ), and making the distribution more Gaussian effectively reduces the number of clusters needed to describe the intermittent regime.…”
Section: Non-stationary Clustering Based On a Linear-autoregressive-fmentioning
confidence: 77%
“…by showing the evolution of the hemodynamic descriptors in a carousel-type representation [228], including animations. A recent study also extruded a third dimension in the barycentric AIM to contextualize the time evolution of the turbulence characteristics [243]. Interpretations may also be facilitated by visualizing the flow frequency content in different ways [170,171], as well as topology skeleton visualization on the lumen wall or in the near-wall region.…”
Section: Chapter 6 Outlookmentioning
confidence: 99%