Abstract:The exchange of heat, momentum, and mass in the atmosphere over mountainous terrain is controlled by synoptic-scale dynamics, thermally driven mesoscale circulations, and turbulence. This article reviews the key challenges relevant to the understanding of exchange processes in the mountain boundary layer and outlines possible research priorities for the future. The review describes the limitations of the experimental study of turbulent exchange over complex terrain, the impact of slope and valley breezes on the structure of the convective boundary layer, and the role of intermittent mixing and wave-turbulence interaction in the stable boundary layer. The interplay between exchange processes at different spatial scales is discussed in depth, emphasizing the role of elevated and ground-based stable layers in controlling multi-scale interactions in the atmosphere over and near mountains. Implications of the current understanding of exchange processes over mountains towards the improvement of numerical weather prediction and climate models are discussed, considering in particular the representation of surface boundary conditions, the parameterization of sub-grid-scale exchange, and the development of stochastic perturbation schemes.
The theoretical treatment of turbulence is largely based on the assumption of horizontally homogeneous and flat underlying surfaces. Correspondingly, approaches developed over the years to measure turbulence statistics in order to test this theoretical understanding or to provide model input, are also largely based on the same assumption of horizontally homogeneous and flat terrain. Here we discuss aspects of turbulence measurements that require special attention in mountainous terrain. We especially emphasize the importance of data quality (flux corrections, data quality assessment, uncertainty estimates) and address the issues of coordinate systems and different post-processing options in mountainous terrain. The appropriate choice of post-processing methods is then tested based on local scaling arguments. We demonstrate that conclusions drawn from turbulence measurements obtained in mountainous terrain are rather sensitive to these post-processing choices and give suggestions as to those that are most appropriate.
Turbulence data from the CASES‐99 field experiment, over comparatively horizontally homogeneous and flat terrain, are separated based on the anisotropy of the Reynolds stress tensor (into isotropic, two‐component axisymmetric and one‐component turbulence) and flux‐variance similarity scaling relations are tested. Results illustrate that different states of anisotropy correspond to different similarity relations, especially under unstable stratification. Experimental data with close to isotropic turbulence match similarity relationships well. On the other hand, very anisotropic turbulence deviates significantly from the traditional scaling relations. We examine in detail the characteristics of these states of anisotropy, identify conditions in which they occur and connect them with different governing parameters. The governing parameters of turbulence anisotropy are shown to be different for stable and unstable stratification, but are able to delineate clearly the conditions in which each of the anisotropy states occurs.
Numerical simulations of flow over steep terrain using 11 different nonhydrostatic numerical models are compared and analyzed. A basic benchmark case and five other test cases are simulated in a two-dimensional framework using an identical initial state is based on conditions on 25 March 2006 during Intensive Observation Period (IOP) 6 of the Terrain-Induced Rotor Experiment (T-REX), in which intense mountain-wave activity was observed. All of the models use an identical horizontal resolution of 1 km and the same vertical resolution. The six simulated test cases use various terrain heights: a 100-m bell shaped hill, a 1000-m idealized ridge that is steeper on the lee slope, a 2500-m ridge, and a cross Sierra terrain profile. The models are tested with both free slip and no slip lower boundary conditions.The results indicate a surprisingly diverse spectrum of simulated mountain wave characteristics including lee waves, hydraulic-like jump features, and gravity wave breaking. The vertical velocity standard deviation is over a factor of two larger in the free slip experiments relative to the no slip simulations. Nevertheless, the no slip simulations exhibit considerable variations in the wave characteristics. The vertical flux of horizontal momentum profiles vary significantly among the models, particularly for the case with realistic Sierra terrain. The results imply relatively low predictability of key characteristics of topographically-forced flows such as the strength of downslope winds and stratospheric wave breaking. The vertical flux of horizontal momentum, which is a domain integrated quantity, exhibits considerable spread among the models, particularly for the experiments with the 2500-m ridge and Sierra terrain. The diversity among the various model simulations, all initialized with identical initial states, suggests that model dynamical cores may be an important component of diversity for the design of mesoscale ensemble systems for topographically-forced flows. The inter-model differences are significantly larger than sensitivity experiments within a single modeling system. IntroductionThe fundamental linear theory for the generation of inviscid mountain waves forced by stratified air flow over two-dimensional obstacles has been established for several decades (e.g., Queney et al. 1960;Smith 1979;Smith 1989). Vertically propagating mountain waves often amplify in the stratosphere due to the decrease of atmospheric density with altitude and nonlinear processes, which may lead to overturning and turbulent breakdown (e.g., Lindzen 1988;Bacmeister and Schoeberl 1989). Mountain waves can have an important impact on the atmosphere due to their role in downslope windstorms (Klemp and Lilly 1975), clear-air turbulence (Clark et al. 2000), vertical mixing of water vapor, aerosols, and chemical constituents in the stratosphere (Dörnbrack and Dürbeck 1998), potential vorticity generation (Schär and Durran 1997), and orographic drag influence on the general circulation (Bretherton 1969;Ólafsson and Bougeau...
The correct simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) is crucial for reliable weather forecasts in truly complex terrain. However, common assumptions for model parametrizations are only valid for horizontally homogeneous and flat terrain. Here, we evaluate the turbulence parametrization of the numerical weather prediction model COSMO with a horizontal grid spacing of for the Inn Valley, Austria. The long-term, high-resolution turbulence measurements of the i-Box measurement sites provide a useful data pool of the ABL structure in the valley and on slopes. We focus on days and nights when ABL processes dominate and a thermally-driven circulation is present. Simulations are performed for case studies with both a one-dimensional turbulence parametrization, which only considers the vertical turbulent exchange, and a hybrid turbulence parametrization, also including horizontal shear production and advection in the budget of turbulence kinetic energy (TKE). We find a general underestimation of TKE by the model with the one-dimensional turbulence parametrization. In the simulations with the hybrid turbulence parametrization, the modelled TKE has a more realistic structure, especially in situations when the TKE production is dominated by shear related to the afternoon up-valley flow, and during nights, when a stable ABL is present. The model performance also improves for stations on the slopes. An estimation of the horizontal shear production from the observation network suggests that three-dimensional effects are a relevant part of TKE production in the valley.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.