1996
DOI: 10.1103/physrevd.53.73
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scale dependence of polarized deep inelastic scattering asymmetries

Abstract: We compare the Q 2 dependence of the polarized deep inelastic scattering proton asymmetry, driven by the leading order Altarelli Parisi evolution equations, to those arising from fixed order αs and α 2 s approximations. It is shown that the evolution effects associated with gluons, which are not properly taken into account by the leading order approximation, cannot be neglected in the analysis of the most recent experimental data.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
46
0

Year Published

1996
1996
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
46
0
Order By: Relevance
“…With this definition of factorization in the case P 2 = 0 we make sure that we obtain the same NLO corrections as in [19], where P 2 = 0, when in the P 2 = 0 calculation we choose P 2 extremely small. So, for the actual calculations we apply the formulas (2)- (5) where M is now given by (13). We note that for averaging over the spin of initial gluons and photons we apply a factor 1/(2 − 2ǫ), that gives rise to some additional finite terms which should be included in (9) when expanded in ǫ.…”
Section: Subtraction Of Photon Initial State Singularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…With this definition of factorization in the case P 2 = 0 we make sure that we obtain the same NLO corrections as in [19], where P 2 = 0, when in the P 2 = 0 calculation we choose P 2 extremely small. So, for the actual calculations we apply the formulas (2)- (5) where M is now given by (13). We note that for averaging over the spin of initial gluons and photons we apply a factor 1/(2 − 2ǫ), that gives rise to some additional finite terms which should be included in (9) when expanded in ǫ.…”
Section: Subtraction Of Photon Initial State Singularitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is expected that the resolved component decreases relative to the contribution from the direct photon processes as the virtuality of the photon increases. Some theoretical studies of the single inclusive and dijet inclusive cross section in LO have been presented recently [12,13,14].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…LX, ep ! LX) where all relevant coefficient functions are now available at next-to-leading order (NLO) [2,[6][7][8]. In various analyses of processes sensitive to polarized parton distributions it has turned out to be particularly useful to study distributions differential in the rapidity of a produced particle [9], on which we will therefore focus also in the present analysis.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The situation in NLO [4,17] is much more complicated than in LO, since factorization is replaced by convolution, and it is also more complicated than inclusive DIS in NLO since here one has to contend with double convolutions of the form q ⊗ C ⊗ D and ∆q ⊗ ∆C ⊗ D for the unpolarized and polarized cases respectively, where C and ∆C are Wilson coefficients first derived in [17] and [4].…”
Section: Semi-inclusive Analysis In Nlo Qcdmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…involving the detection of the produced hadron h. The theoretical structure for the analysis of such reactions, in both leading order QCD (LO) and next-to-leading order (NLO), exists [4]. However we are critical of the type of LO analysis carried out thus far by the experimental groups.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%