2022
DOI: 10.1002/mgg3.2072
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Scalable detection of technically challenging variants through modified next‐generation sequencing

Abstract: Background: Some clinically important genetic variants are not easily evaluated with next-generation sequencing (NGS) methods due to technical challenges arising from high-similarity copies (e.g., PMS2, SMN1/SMN2, GBA1, HBA1/HBA2, CYP21A2), repetitive short sequences (e.g., ARX polyalanine repeats, FMR1 AGG interruptions in CGG repeats, CFTR poly-T/TG repeats), and other complexities (e.g., MSH2 Boland inversions). Methods:We customized our NGS processes to detect the technically challenging variants mentioned… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the context of ARX ‐related disorder, panel and exome sequencing may fail to provide the diagnosis because the most common type of ARX disease‐causing variants, polyalanine tract expansions, can be missed. This is due to multiple mechanisms such as suboptimal polymerase processivity and fidelity at repetitive sequences, 11 as was the case in Patient #2 and #3. WGS and single‐gene testing for ARX include a dedicated evaluation for the polyalanine tract expansion and should be considered alongside other genetic investigations for male infants with epilepsy‐dyskinesia syndromes, male infants with epileptic spasms in the setting of agenesis of the corpus callosum with or without ambiguous genitalia and in the association between hand dystonia and epilepsy in infancy or early childhood, which is considered highly suggestive of ARX ‐related disorder and should prompt specific genetic testing 12,13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…However, in the context of ARX ‐related disorder, panel and exome sequencing may fail to provide the diagnosis because the most common type of ARX disease‐causing variants, polyalanine tract expansions, can be missed. This is due to multiple mechanisms such as suboptimal polymerase processivity and fidelity at repetitive sequences, 11 as was the case in Patient #2 and #3. WGS and single‐gene testing for ARX include a dedicated evaluation for the polyalanine tract expansion and should be considered alongside other genetic investigations for male infants with epilepsy‐dyskinesia syndromes, male infants with epileptic spasms in the setting of agenesis of the corpus callosum with or without ambiguous genitalia and in the association between hand dystonia and epilepsy in infancy or early childhood, which is considered highly suggestive of ARX ‐related disorder and should prompt specific genetic testing 12,13 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Moreover, NGS has only recently been introduced into clinical practice to assess diagnosis and prognosis and to evaluate therapeutic strategies, but it is still a niche and there is room for improvement. In addition, sequencing of some parts of the genome remains challenging, e.g., highly polygenic regions, pseudogenes, triplet expansions, low complexity regions, short repetitive sequences, regions of high-similarity, and complex structural rearrangements ( Treangen and Salzberg, 2012 ; Rojahn et al, 2022 ). It is estimated that approximately 14% of clinically relevant genetic tests are located in these genomic regions ( Lincoln et al, 2021 ), and correct variant identification can be difficult.…”
Section: Machine Learning In Cancer Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, short tandem repeats and complex structural variants known to play a role in the pathogenesis of certain diseases can now be sequenced using a targeted approach with long reads sequencing technology, as longer reads are expected to generate appropriate sequence length that overlaps better during assembly ( Stevanovski et al, 2022 ). On the other hand, these technical difficulties can be at least partially overcome by adapting NGS analysis workflows accordingly ( Rojahn et al, 2022 ). However, detecting variants in these regions remains challenging and difficult to validate.…”
Section: Machine Learning In Cancer Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%