2005
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.94.232302
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Saturation of Azimuthal Anisotropy in Au+Au Collisions at sNN=62–200  GeV

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a picture of hydrodynamic expansion of the system formed in the collisions, these anisotropies are expected to arise owing to initial pressure gradients and subsequent interactions of the constituents [4,5]. Specifically, differential measurements [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] of azimuthal anisotropy have been found to be sensitive to (a) the equation of state (EOS), (b) thermalization, (c) transport coefficients of the medium, and (d) initial conditions in the heavy-ion collisions. Hence, it is important to study the dependence of azimuthal anisotropy as a function of several variables, for example center-of-mass energy ( √ s NN ), collision centrality, transverse momentum (p T ), and pseudorapidity (η).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In a picture of hydrodynamic expansion of the system formed in the collisions, these anisotropies are expected to arise owing to initial pressure gradients and subsequent interactions of the constituents [4,5]. Specifically, differential measurements [6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19] of azimuthal anisotropy have been found to be sensitive to (a) the equation of state (EOS), (b) thermalization, (c) transport coefficients of the medium, and (d) initial conditions in the heavy-ion collisions. Hence, it is important to study the dependence of azimuthal anisotropy as a function of several variables, for example center-of-mass energy ( √ s NN ), collision centrality, transverse momentum (p T ), and pseudorapidity (η).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nonmonotonic variation of azimuthal anisotropy as a function of collision centrality and √ s NN could indicate the softest point of the EOS in heavy-ion reactions [29]. Further, it has been argued that the observation of saturation of differential azimuthal anisotropies v 2 (p T ) of charged hadrons in Au + Au collisions in the √ s NN range of 62.4-200 GeV is a signature of a mixed phase [15]. The new data presented in this paper shows to what extent such a saturation effect is observed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, already in the assumption of a non dissipative QGP the estimation of the initial energy density has to be considered with care. The importance of the initial condition has been shown by the large elliptic flow, v 2 , in Au+Au and Cu+Cu collisions at RHIC energies [29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40]. The centrality, pseudorapidity, and transverse momentum dependences of v 2 data are described reasonably well by employing the Glauber-type initial conditions and implementing hadronic dissipative effects in ideal hydrodynamic models [41].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Since the symmetry planes are not accessible experimentally, the flow coefficients are estimated solely from the azimuthal angles of the particles emitted in the transverse plane. Measurements of different anisotropic flow coefficients at both the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) [32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45][46] not only confirmed the production of a strongly coupled quark-gluon plasma (sQGP) but also contributed in constraining the value of the ratio between shear viscosity and entropy density (η/s) which is very close to the lower limit of 1/4π conjectured by AdS/CFT [47]. In addition, the comparison between experimental data [41] and viscous hydrodynamical calculations [48] showed that higher order flow coefficients and more importantly their transverse momentum dependence are more sensitive probes than lower order coefficients, i.e.…”
Section: Jhep06(2020)147mentioning
confidence: 99%