2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1744-6570.2009.01162.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Satisfaction, Citizenship Behaviors, and Performance in Work Units: A Meta-Analysis of Collective Construct Relations

Abstract: This paper offers theoretical development clarifying the structure and function of collective job satisfaction and uses meta‐analytic methods (k = 73) to examine the satisfaction–performance relationship when both constructs are construed at the work unit level. Overall, our results suggest that the relationship between unit‐level job satisfaction and unit‐level performance is significant (ρ= .34). Specifically, significant relationships were found between unit‐level job satisfaction and unit‐level criteria, i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

10
265
1
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 288 publications
(286 citation statements)
references
References 139 publications
(164 reference statements)
10
265
1
10
Order By: Relevance
“…A subsample (10%) of all studies initially selected against the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis was checked by two of the three authors, interrater agreement was 100%. Our primary study sample size is in line with recent meta-analyses (e.g., Richter, Dawson & West, 2011;Whitman, Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, 2010;Mesmer-Magnus & DeChurch, 2009) and considerably higher than others (e.g., Hogan & Holland, 2003;Bartram, 2005). ** Table 1 about here**…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriasupporting
confidence: 61%
“…A subsample (10%) of all studies initially selected against the criteria for inclusion in the meta-analysis was checked by two of the three authors, interrater agreement was 100%. Our primary study sample size is in line with recent meta-analyses (e.g., Richter, Dawson & West, 2011;Whitman, Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, 2010;Mesmer-Magnus & DeChurch, 2009) and considerably higher than others (e.g., Hogan & Holland, 2003;Bartram, 2005). ** Table 1 about here**…”
Section: Inclusion Criteriasupporting
confidence: 61%
“…Hence, workplace spirituality is considered a key factor that increases employees' happiness. Some researchers have proposed that happy employees are more cooperative, respect others more, and are more inclined to demonstrate OCB (Avey, Wernsing & Luthans, 2008;Whitman, Van Rooy & Viswesvaran, 2010). Thus, Podsakoff, Whiting, Podsakoff and Blume (2009) showed an inverse relationship between OCB and intention to leave.…”
Section: Citizenship Behaviourmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although these aggregates are not interchangeable with their individual-level counterparts, all have been conceived as unit-level indicators of collective favor or disfavor with the job, organization, and/or work environment (Whitman, Van Rooy, & Viswesvaran, 2010). When attitudes and perceptions are sufficiently shared (as research indicates is often the case due to social contagion and exposure to similar work environments; Felps et al, 2009;Ryan et al, 1996;Whitman et al, 2010), these constructs may signal a collective-level desirability of movement that is analogous to the concept most often found at the individual level (and most often indexed as job satisfaction; Mobley, 1982). Positive shared attitudes and perceptions signal that members derive benefits (e.g., working in a committed team) that would be foregone through leaving, whereas negative views, especially those that are shared, become a common topic of discussion among members (Felps et al, 2009), inducing employees to look elsewhere for more satisfying work.…”
Section: Shared Attitudes Toward the Job And Organization Numerous Rmentioning
confidence: 99%