2021
DOI: 10.1002/jmv.27001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS‐CoV‐2 show no infectivity at later stages in a prolonged COVID‐19 patient despite positivity in RNA testing

Abstract: Inpatient coronavirus disease 2019 cases present enormous costs to patients and health systems in the United States. Many hospitalized patients may continue testing COVID-19 positive even after the resolution of symptoms. Thus, a pressing concern for clinicians is the safety of discharging these asymptomatic patients if they have any remaining infectivity. This case report explores the viral viability in a patient with persistent COVID-19 over the course of a 2-month hospitalization. Positive nasopharyngeal s… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, we successfully isolated infectious viruses from samples with a low estimated viral load ( C T value, >32). These data are supported by reports of infectious virus recovery from samples with C T values of 32 ( 14 , 23 ) and the previously determined C T value cutoff of 37 for virus isolation from URT specimens ( 23 ). This apparent discrepancy could be due to the differences in viral culture assays implemented which will differ in sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…However, we successfully isolated infectious viruses from samples with a low estimated viral load ( C T value, >32). These data are supported by reports of infectious virus recovery from samples with C T values of 32 ( 14 , 23 ) and the previously determined C T value cutoff of 37 for virus isolation from URT specimens ( 23 ). This apparent discrepancy could be due to the differences in viral culture assays implemented which will differ in sensitivity.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…van Kampen and colleagues reported low (5%) infectious virus recovery 15 days after symptom onset or longer ( 24 ). Nevertheless, the recovery of cultivable virus up to 18 and 24 days after symptom onset has been reported ( 14 , 23 ). In the present study, we achieved infectious virus recovery in 27.45% of patients after the 14th day after symptoms onset, including 6 patients with persistent SARS-CoV-2 detection by rRT-PCR for longer than 21 days.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Various commercial SARS-CoV-2 pseudoviruses are also available for purchase from mybiosource.com, Takara, eEnzyme, and multiple other companies. Limitations of this platform include the need to create a separate assay to test different aspects of virus mechanisms or other proteins and potential variability between the protein functions of pseudotyped virus and wild type virus [422]. While some studies as in Case et al [421] had determined strong correlations between pseudovirus results and wild type, few studies using pseudoviruses confirm findings with wild type virus.…”
Section: Micro-neutralization Assaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 Based on these findings, a common practice is to isolate COVID‐19 patients for 14 days and to discontinue the quarantine without further testing given the patient is asymptomatic for at least 48 h. There are also reports that describe infectivity for at least 24 days after disease onset in patients with severe COVID‐19 but showing no infectivity at later stages of a prolonged COVID‐19 infection despite positivity in RNA testing. 12 Hence, because of the discrepancy of this finding to the experiments aimed at isolating active virus and the current time periods for quarantine, the timeline for discontinuation of transmission‐based precautions is extensively debated.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%