2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.celrep.2022.111496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 infections elicit higher levels of original antigenic sin antibodies compared with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccinations

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
18
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
2
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…S5). This is likely related to the more standardized dose ( 24 ) and nature of vaccination compared with infection ( 25 27 ) but might also be due to varying time intervals between infection and specimen collection in the convalescent specimens compared with those in postvaccination specimens ( 28 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S5). This is likely related to the more standardized dose ( 24 ) and nature of vaccination compared with infection ( 25 27 ) but might also be due to varying time intervals between infection and specimen collection in the convalescent specimens compared with those in postvaccination specimens ( 28 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of OAS was first described for influenza antibodies (17), with imprinting from prior influenza infections on immune responses following subsequent influenza infection and vaccination noted in more recent work (18)(19)(20). OAS from antibodies generated by prior OC43/HKU1 seasonal coronavirus infections occurs; and is seen more potently following SARS-CoV-2 infection than after the 1st mRNA vaccine dose, with SARS-CoV-2 infection driving a boost of lower affinity antibodies (21). Potentially beneficial imprinting has also been described; omicron breakthrough infections in infection-naive vaccinated individuals induce antibodies from B cells that cross-react with receptor-binding domains from multiple variants and provide a greater breadth of protective immunity whereas antibodies following primary omicron infections in infection-naive unvaccinated individuals are of much narrower specificity (16).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We also found that antibodies elicited to seasonal coronaviruses to have decreased durability suggesting immunity to seasonal coronaviruses is short-lived as previously reported 12,14,28 . Since only human serological studies on the imprinting effects of seasonal coronaviruses have previously been performed, our study is the first experimental investigation of its kind isolating the immunological impacts of specific coronaviruses 14,[26][27][28][29][61][62][63][64][65][66][67] . Our results bring valuable insight into the specific contributions of preexisting immunity from coronavirus infection and the associated mechanisms of regulation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%