2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.jiph.2022.01.018
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SARS-CoV-2 antibody prevalence among healthcare workers: A cross-sectional study at a quaternary healthcare center in Saudi Arabia

Abstract: Background The objective of this study was to determine the seroprevalence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies among Healthcare Workers (HCWs). Methods We carried out a cross-sectional study among 3644 HCWs at King Saud Medical City (KSMC) during the last two weeks of December 2020. A Google form survey was used to collect data on demographics, underlying health conditions, job duties, infection control competencies, COVID-19 exposure history, symptoms, and confirmed infections. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(13 reference statements)
3
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high seroprevalence among HCW in this study reflects the reality that HCWs are at a high-risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection given their direct role in patient care [ 38 ]. This is in line with reports from Saudi Arabia where seroprevalence among HCW in December 2020 was 10-folds higher (26.5%) than that among general population (2.36%) in May 2020 [ 39 , 40 ]. Another study from South Africa (Gauteng Province), illustrated a period prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections ranged from 6.1% to 15.4% for the period 1 June—31 August 2020 [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The high seroprevalence among HCW in this study reflects the reality that HCWs are at a high-risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection given their direct role in patient care [ 38 ]. This is in line with reports from Saudi Arabia where seroprevalence among HCW in December 2020 was 10-folds higher (26.5%) than that among general population (2.36%) in May 2020 [ 39 , 40 ]. Another study from South Africa (Gauteng Province), illustrated a period prevalence of SARS-CoV-2 infections ranged from 6.1% to 15.4% for the period 1 June—31 August 2020 [ 41 ].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The high seroprevalence among HCW in this study re ects the fact that HCWs are at a high-risk of acquiring SARS-CoV-2 infection given their direct role in patient care [32]. This is in line with reports from Saudi Arabia where seroprevalence among HCW in December 2020 was 10-folds [33], higher than that among general population May 2020 [34]. However, Epidemiological containment measures were inadequately implemented in Yemen due to the political status of the country, which likely accelerated the spread of the virus among the HCWs and ultimately increased the pressure on the healthcare settings that lacked access to appropriate PPE and practiced limited compliance to IPC measure [35] and ultimately intensely exposed HCW to infection.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 87%
“…In general, our overall test performance-adjusted SARS-CoV-2 seroprevalence estimate of 22.5% among HCWs in private and public hospitals was similar to the reported seroprevalence estimates in conducted cross-sectional studies of HCWs in the UK (24.4%) ( 14 ), New York City (27.0%), and Saudi Arabia (26.5%) ( 2 , 14 , 15 ). Consistent with other studies, we also observed variation in SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity by HCWs' hospital role and department ( 4 , 14 ).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…Similarly a systematic review on 49 similar studies reported higher seropositivity in HCWs working in COVID-19 patient wards, direct work with patients, front lines, and health care assistants ( 17 ). Another study in middle east also reported that HCWs who spent a longer duration working with patients with COVID-19 were at increased risk for seropositivity ( 15 ). A large cross-sectional study on 1,40,782 HCWs in various hospital roles demonstrated higher odds of positive serology among internal medicine specialists and sub-specialities and lower odds of seropositivity among pathologists and forensic medicine specialist.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%