2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-019-04073-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sarcopenia, dynapenia, and body composition in Parkinson’s disease: are they good predictors of disability?: a case–control study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
20
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
20
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, some other studies believed that sarcopenia had no correlations with disease duration (14), HY (14), UPDRS-I (14), UPDRS-II (14), depression (15,17), and cognition (14,15). In addition, some studies found that falls incidence (15,16) and female proportion (20) in PD with sarcopenia were higher than those in PD without sarcopenia. However, some studies reported that there were no differences in falls incidence (20) and female proportion (14,15) between PD patients with and without sarcopenia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…However, some other studies believed that sarcopenia had no correlations with disease duration (14), HY (14), UPDRS-I (14), UPDRS-II (14), depression (15,17), and cognition (14,15). In addition, some studies found that falls incidence (15,16) and female proportion (20) in PD with sarcopenia were higher than those in PD without sarcopenia. However, some studies reported that there were no differences in falls incidence (20) and female proportion (14,15) between PD patients with and without sarcopenia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, some studies found that falls incidence (15,16) and female proportion (20) in PD with sarcopenia were higher than those in PD without sarcopenia. However, some studies reported that there were no differences in falls incidence (20) and female proportion (14,15) between PD patients with and without sarcopenia. Therefore, the main objective of the current study was acted in accordance with PICOS through systematical review and meta-analysis method: participants (P): patients with a diagnosis of PD from medical institutions or population; intervention (I): PD patients with sarcopenia; control (C): PD patients without sarcopenia; outcome (O): the prevalence of sarcopenia in PD patients, and the differences in clinical features between PD patients with and without sarcopenia; and study design (S): cohort study, case-control study, or cross-sectional study.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations