2010 WASE International Conference on Information Engineering 2010
DOI: 10.1109/icie.2010.101
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

SAR Target Recognition with Data Fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results of majority voting classification show a marked improvement over classification with a single, monostatic, observation. This confirms the expectations set by (5). Any two bistatic observations would also produce an improved probability of correct classification for the consensus, , and would increase even more if the bistatic observations were chosen to maximize the individual probabilities of correct classification, .…”
Section: Classsupporting
confidence: 75%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The results of majority voting classification show a marked improvement over classification with a single, monostatic, observation. This confirms the expectations set by (5). Any two bistatic observations would also produce an improved probability of correct classification for the consensus, , and would increase even more if the bistatic observations were chosen to maximize the individual probabilities of correct classification, .…”
Section: Classsupporting
confidence: 75%
“…Another branch of SAR ATR research has led to the use of aspect diversity for improving target recognition [5][6][7][8]. The approaches fuse monostatic SAR observations of a target from multiple look angles to provide more information about the target and thereby improve recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the realm of automatic target recognition using synthetic aperture radar images, many recent papers describe how to improve the performance of target recognition using multiple looks (Ding and Wen, 2017;Huan and Pan, 2013;Laubie et al, 2015Laubie et al, , 2018Salvador, 2016;Situ et al, 2016;Zhang et al, 2012). Earlier research (Bhanu and Jones, 2002;Brown, 2003;Jin et al, 2006;Laine and Bauer, 2008;Ruohong et al, 2010;Snyder and Ettinger, 2003;Vespe et al, 2005). This research shows that the performance of target recognition can be significantly improved through the data fusion of observations at different looks (referred to as aspect diversity).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…6, we show PCC lines obtained by using DWT data fusion algorithm, PCA data fusion algorithm, and POCS super-resolution reconstruction algorithm in the data level with four multi-aspect images in aspect separation ranging from 1°to 30°. The step of POCS superresolution reconstruction is substituted by DWT data fusion or PCA data fusion, when DWT data fusion algorithm or PCA data fusion algorithm is used in SAR multi-aspect image recognition [9,10]. From Fig.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysis With Mstar Datasetmentioning
confidence: 99%