Sanksi Hukum Terhadap Notaris Yang Melanggar Kewajiban Dan Larangan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris

Abstract

Law Number 2 of 2014 on Notary Function (UUJN) governs on Civil and Administrative sanctions to Notary violating obligations and prohibition as set forth in Article 16 and 17 of UUJN, however criminal sanction is not governed in the UUJN, therefore the application of criminal sanction itself has not been able to be imposed to a Notary violating the obligations and prohibitions of UUJN. And there is no arrangement to the mechanism of civil sanction imposition related to the cancellation of deed in the event of the authentic deed in the UUJN. Based on the background, the problems arising, namely, first How is the setting of legal sanctions against Notary violating Obligations and Prohibition of UUJN and second, what is the mechanism of handing down sanction (pursuant to the procedural law) to the Notary violating obligations and prohibitions UUJN how is the settlement mechanism of legal sanctions against Notary violating UUJN-P?
 This study is qualified as a normative legal research. The source of legal materials for this study was obtained from primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. The results of this thesis are civil sanction is governed in Article 16 paragraph (9 and 12), Article 41, Article 44 paragraph (5), Article 48 paragraph (3), Article 49 paragraph (4), Article 50 paragraph (5) and Article 51 paragraph (4) of UUJN. The administrative sanction is governed in Article 7 paragraph (2), Article 16 paragraph (11 and 13), Article 17 paragraph (2), Article 19 paragraph (4), Article 32 paragraph (4) Article 37 paragraph (2), Article 54 paragraph (2) and Article 65A of UUJN. Criminal sanctions are not governed, but a notary may be charged with criminal sanction pursuant to the provisions of Penal Code, providing that the act of the notary has complied with the formulation of breaches set forth in the UUJN, ethic codes and Penal Code. Second, the mechanism of application of civil sanction related to the cancellation of authentic deed into under hand deed should go through civil lawsuit process at general court lodged by the parties whose names are stipulated in the deed and suffer from damages as the effect of such deed. The mechanism of application of administrative sanctions to a notary should be directly imposed by the Supervisory Board, where the sanctions are gradually applied. The mechanism of application of criminal sanction to a notary if proved to commit the criminal act, the Notary shall be penalized and generally Penal Code can be applied to the Notary pursuant to the principle of lex spcialist derogate legi generali interpreted in a contrario manner.

Tanggung Jawab Notaris Dalam Pembuatan Akta Otentik Dengan Bahasa Asing

“…Sanksi dapat berupa ganti rugi maupun beserta bunga, penggantian biaya dan segala hal yang merupakan akibat pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh Notaris sebagai natuurlijk persoon yang menyebabkan akta para pihak berubah menjadi akta dibawah tangan sebagaimana dimaksud Pasal 84 UUJN. 10 c. Tanggung jawab secara pidana Apabila ditemukan fakta bahwa Notaris dalam proses penyusunan aktanya terbukti secara sengaja dengan itikad buruk melanggar ketentuan UUJN demi kepentingan pribadi maupun pihak tertentu maka ia dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban secara pidana. Dalam hal ini Notaris tidak dapat lagi dilindungi dengan ketentuan UUJN melainkan harus bertanggungjawab secara pidana dibawah ketentuan Pasal 266 KUHP yang mengatur bahwa siapapun yang meminta atau memasukkan keterangan palsu, dalam hal ini adalah segala bentuk keterangan baik secara lisan mapun tertulis yang mengandung unsur ketidak benaran yang seolah-olah benar yang kemudian sengaja dipergunakan di dalam pembuatan akta autentik.…”

Hak Notaris Menolak Pembuatan Akta yang Mengandung Unsur Riba dengan Alasan Menjalankan Prinsip Syariat

“…Sаlаh sаtunyа dinyаtаkаn di dаlаm Pаsаl 16 аyаt (1) huruf e Undаng-Undаng Nomor 2 Tаhun 2014 tentаng Perubаhаn Аtаs Undаng-Undаng Nomor 30 Tаhun 2004 tentаng Jаbаtаn Notаris (selаnjutnyа disebut UUJN-P) yаng menyatakan bahwa notаris berkewаjiban untuk memberikan pelаyаnаn sesuаi dengаn UUJN-P, kecuаli аdа аlаsаn untuk menolаknyа. Menurut ketentuan ini, notаris yаng tidаk melаksаnаkаn kewаjibаn dаpаt diаnggаp melаnggаr dan harus menerima sanksi (Mardiyah, Setiabudhi, & Swardhana, 2017). Maka dari itu, sedapat mungkin notaris akan berusaha memberikan pelayanan.…”

“…Jenis sаnksi dаlаm Pаsаl 16 аyаt (11) UUJN-P dаpаt dikаtegorikаn ke dаlаm jenis sаnksi аdministrаsi. Penerаpаn sаnksi tersebut sifаtnyа grаduаl аtаu berjenjаng sehingga penerapan ketentuan Pаsаl 16 аyаt (11) UUJN-P harus melihat tingkat berat atau ringannya pelanggaran yang dilakukan oleh notaris (Mardiyah, Setiabudhi, & Swardhana, 2017). Selаin terikаt oleh аturаnаturаn yаng termuаt di dаlаm UUJN, notаris jugа hаrus pаtuh terhаdаp kode etik lembаgа notаris.…”