2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.petrol.2015.07.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sand rate model and data processing method for non-intrusive ultrasonic sand monitoring in flow pipeline

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Relationship 5 in Table 1 is similar to the relationship proposed by Gao et al [16 ], but in this relationship, instead of considering the fixed exponent of two for fluid velocity (as proposed by Gao), a parametric exponent is considered for the fluid velocity. Gao assumes that the velocity of the sand particles reaches the fluid velocity and therefore considered that the kinematic energy of each sand particle has a relationship with the squared velocity of the fluid.…”
Section: Discussion and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Relationship 5 in Table 1 is similar to the relationship proposed by Gao et al [16 ], but in this relationship, instead of considering the fixed exponent of two for fluid velocity (as proposed by Gao), a parametric exponent is considered for the fluid velocity. Gao assumes that the velocity of the sand particles reaches the fluid velocity and therefore considered that the kinematic energy of each sand particle has a relationship with the squared velocity of the fluid.…”
Section: Discussion and Findingsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Gao et al [16 ] has suggested the linear relationship (2 ) between the sand flow rate and acoustic signal in which the square of the fluid velocity is used for calculating the sand flow rate. Gao et al created an air–liquid–sand mixture in which fluid moved with a velocity of 5.5 to 8.5 m 3 /h.…”
Section: Background Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This type of device can be inefficient as they are not robust and need replaced after establishing the sand presence. Although such methods provide a reasonable assessment of the cumulative sand production, they are not effective in providing the real time or instantaneous indication of sand production [4]. Therefore, there is a need for a non-intrusive, fast, easily and cheaply maintained technique that can monitor large structures or pipelines from a single sensor location.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method was implemented in this work. Gao et al [4] mounted an acoustic sensor on the external surface of a bend in a 1 inch diameter pipe in a multiphase flow loop and varied flow speed between 5 to 9.5 ms -1 and used fine sand of 100 µm size at 1wt.% concentration. Using a combination of hard band-pass filtering for the analog signal and a wavelet threshold de-noising algorithm for the digital signal, they were able to filter out the noise from other sources in the signal and improve signal to noise ratio for sand signals about 30%.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some petroleum instrument development companies have developed the multiphase fluid sand monitoring system. For example, the Danish Clampon company developed sand monitoring system DSP-06, which is developed based on the "Clamp smart ultrasonic sensor" technology [2], but the measurement accuracy cannot meet the field measurement requirements. The main reasons are as follows: There didn't have a mature sand production monitoring model, the most system uses the sand production model described previously, which gives a sand production calculation model [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%