Until recently, research in sociolegal studies has tended to ignore the Caribbean region. Sociolegal scholars may have assumed that the Caribbean, like other places outside the United States, more properly deserved the attention of anthropologists than themselves-after all, "they" have "custom" while "we" have "law."l Or, assuming that the colonial project represented an encounter between competing legal systems, sociolegal scholars may have left such studies to anthropologists interested in legal pluralism.* Caribbeanist anthropologists, who have tended to neglect legal processes in the region, may have assumed that the effects of law in Caribbean societies were self-evident: that slave era law helped maintain the plantation system, that indenture law ensured a pliant labor force after slavery ended, and that law in the colonial and decolonizing Caribbean simply did what its ideology claims it does by mediating disputes, administering Bill Maurer is a lecturer in anthropology at Stanford University. The author thanks Jane Collier, Robin Balliger, and Elizabeth Mem for their helpful comments and suggestions on earlier drafts. He takes full responsibility for any errors or inconsistencies that remain in spite of their patient and careful readings. He also thanks George Collier and Amy Burce for conversations that helped him develop some of the points made in section 11.