2019
DOI: 10.14411/eje.2019.043
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sampling of flower-visiting insects: Poor correspondence between the catches of colour pan-trap and sweep netting

Abstract: Pollinating insects are important and therefore, it is important to be able to assess and monitor changes in their abundance. Consequently, it is essential that the methods used to collect data have some level of precision and are accurate. In the present study, two commonly used methods: colour pan-traps and sweep netting along transects, were compared. A total of 1775 specimens of 120 species of four insect families were caught in twelve clear-cuts in southern Sweden. Overall, Lepturinae (Cerambycidae; 5 spe… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(35 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, in the glade, the largest number of P. marmorata was obtained at heights from 2 to 6 m, with a maximum number at a height of 4 m. The larvae of this species develop in the hollows of dead deciduous trees [71,72]. Imagos are anthophiles and are often found on flowering plants and shrubs [73,74]. Apparently, the anthophilicity of this species is due to the high-height preference in open habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, in the glade, the largest number of P. marmorata was obtained at heights from 2 to 6 m, with a maximum number at a height of 4 m. The larvae of this species develop in the hollows of dead deciduous trees [71,72]. Imagos are anthophiles and are often found on flowering plants and shrubs [73,74]. Apparently, the anthophilicity of this species is due to the high-height preference in open habitats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The copyright holder for this preprint this version posted October 4, 2022. ; https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.10.01.510429 doi: bioRxiv preprint captured at all three southern sites, on sandstone cliff bluffs. Overall, we captured relatively few large-bodied bees, and notably no bumble bees, during the study, but that is most likely a result of the bias of bee bowls to collect smaller bodied genera (Wilson et al 2008, Berglund and Milberg 2019, Portman et al 2020.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many previous authors have noted that the biodiversity trends observed in a monitoring scheme are highly sensitive to sampling methodology [26,40,[79][80][81][82][83][84]. For example, in a European bumble bee survey the three methods used all produced different estimates of the population [79].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultimately, biodiversity trends observed in any study are highly sensitive to sampling methodology (Berglund & Milberg, 2019; Brice et al, 2021; Gardiner et al, 2012; Joshi et al, 2015; O’Connor et al, 2019; Prendergast et al, 2020; Whitworth et al, 2017). For example, in a European bumble bee survey the three methods used all produced different estimates of the population (Wood et al, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%