2009
DOI: 10.1002/elps.200800584
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample stacking in CZE using dynamic thermal junctions I. Analytes with low dpKa/dT crossing a single thermally induced pH junction in a BGE with high dpH/dT

Abstract: The possibility to compress analyte bands at the beginning of CE runs has many advantages. Analytes at low concentration can be analyzed with high signal-to-noise ratios by using the so-called sample stacking methods. Moreover, sample injections with very narrow initial band widths (small initial standard deviations) are sometimes useful, especially if high resolutions among the bands are required in the shortest run time. In the present work, a method of sample stacking is proposed and demonstrated. It is bas… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
(11 reference statements)
0
16
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The antagonist conformation was analyzed at a concentration of 2.5 μM in the same buffer supplemented with 50 μM mifepristone. Due to the temperature dependence of Tris buffer (ΔpK a /°C = − 0.028), 46 a pH drop during the scans (from pH 7.8 at 30°C to pH 6.6 at 70°C) has to be expected.…”
Section: Thermal Unfolding Of Hgr-lbd Mutant Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The antagonist conformation was analyzed at a concentration of 2.5 μM in the same buffer supplemented with 50 μM mifepristone. Due to the temperature dependence of Tris buffer (ΔpK a /°C = − 0.028), 46 a pH drop during the scans (from pH 7.8 at 30°C to pH 6.6 at 70°C) has to be expected.…”
Section: Thermal Unfolding Of Hgr-lbd Mutant Proteinsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Mandaji et al [38,39] introduced a succession of two research articles with a very exciting sample stacking strategy which relies on dynamic thermal junctions. This approach relies on significant pH changes as a result of altered temperature conditions.…”
Section: Best Sensitivity Enhancements and Lodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this case, a different temperature, T s (higher or lower than T r ), is applied synchronously for a short time (much smaller than the time required to make a round trip) during each cycle along this segment, before the temperature is changed back to T r . This causes temporary changes in the local viscosity, conductivity, electric field strength, buffer's pH , and/or analyte's p K a . The following band broadening mechanisms will be taken into account: (i) initial variance of the injected sample plug (σnormali2); (ii) variance added ( d σ 2 = 2 D f dt) due to the continuous injection of the very small hydrodynamic “flow” into the microhole of the intermediate reservoir ( i + 1) when the electrostatic potential difference is applied between reservoirs i and i + 2. This band broadening mechanism is the same that would be observed when running a CE experiment with unleveled buffer reservoirs (see Eq.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the short compression time interval, when the hot (or cold) zone is active, the local conductivity changes and this in turn causes the local electric field ( E ) to change. This would be time consuming to quantify , but fortunately the compression time interval is very short compared to τ , and the following relationship can still be used: μEτ = L . Taking all of this into account produces: truerightNb-0.16em=-0.16em()dnL+12n2mμV4D[]()σi22Dτ-0.16em+-0.16emSrtoDτα2 kn -0.16em+-0.16em()1-0.16em+-0.16emDnormalfD-0.16em+-0.16emDnormalcD1α2 kn 1α2normalkα2normalk.…”
Section: Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation