1968
DOI: 10.1016/0021-9681(68)90082-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample sizes for medical trials with special reference to long-term therapy

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
28
0

Year Published

1974
1974
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 127 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several sample size formulas have been proposed for weighted logrank tests [29,[35][36][37]. In this section, we derive a sample size formula for the test MLR q .…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several sample size formulas have been proposed for weighted logrank tests [29,[35][36][37]. In this section, we derive a sample size formula for the test MLR q .…”
Section: Sample Size Calculationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The reduction of the combined coronary endpoints was expected to be at most 10% in the conventional treatment group, and a 45% reduction in coronary events was assumed in the pravastatin group. A 20% drop-out rate over five years was assumed in both treatment groups (28).…”
Section: Design and Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Its existence has long been noted and studied, for example, in Halperin et al (1968), Zucker & Lakatos (1990) and Chen et al (2002). Treatment saturation time is the time after which the full treatment effect starts to attenuate or diminish due to reasons such as cumulative buildup of drug resistance (Eshleman et al, 2001;Komarova & Wodarz, 2005;Wu et al, 2005).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%