Sample size for estimation of the Pearson correlation coefficient in cherry tomato tests

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the required sample size for estimation of the Pearson coefficient of correlation between cherry tomato variables. Two uniformity tests were set up in a protected environment in the spring/summer of 2014. The observed variables in each plant were mean fruit length, mean fruit width, mean fruit weight, number of bunches, number of fruits per bunch, number of fruits, and total weight of fruits, with calculation of the Pearson correlation matrix between them. Sixty eight sample sizes were planned for one greenhouse and 48 for another, with the initial sample size of 10 plants, and the others were obtained by adding five plants. For each planned sample size, 3000 estimates of the Pearson correlation coefficient were obtained through bootstrap re-samplings with replacement. The sample size for each correlation coefficient was determined when the 95% confidence interval amplitude value was less than or equal to 0.4. Obtaining estimates of the Pearson correlation coefficient with high precision is difficult for parameters with a weak linear relation. Accordingly, a larger sample size is necessary to estimate them. Linear relations involving variables dealing with size and number of fruits per plant have less precision. To estimate the coefficient of correlation between productivity variables of cherry tomato, with a confidence interval of 95% equal to 0.4, it is necessary to sample 275 plants in a 250m² greenhouse, and 200 plants in a 200m² greenhouse.

Sample size for the estimation of Pearson’s linear correlation in crotalaria species

“…Toebe et al (2015) verified that the sample size varies among corn hybrids, crops, and pairs of traits, and that a larger sample size is required to estimate the correlation coefficients between weakly correlated traits and vice-versa, in agreement with that established in studies by Bonett & Wright (2000) and Olivoto et al (2018). The sample size to estimate the Pearson's correlation coefficients was also performed at precision levels in other agricultural crops, such as crambe (Crambe abyssinica) (Cargnelutti Filho et al, 2011), castor bean (Ricinus communis) , and cherry tomato (Solanum lycopersicum 'Cerasiforme') (Sari et al, 2017). A study was recently developed to evaluate the influence of sample size and magnitude of correlation on the confidence interval width for Pearson's correlation coefficients, with real and simulated data (Olivoto et al, 2018).…”

Determinants of Audit Report Lag: Effect of Corporate Governance in Listed Companies in the Malaysian Construction Industry

“…Correlation analysis is used to find out whether a relationship exists and to determine its magnitude and direction. The Pearson correlation coefficient is referred to as a dimensionless measure that determines the strength of linear relations between two variables (Sari et al, 2017). Table 6 demonstrate the correlation analysis result between all the variables used in this study.…”

The Relationship between Precipitation and Elevation of the Watershed in the Khirthar National Range

“…If the regression line passes preciely through every point on the scatter plot, it would be able to explain all of the variations. If it is suitable, it provides the proportion of the variance of a "dependent variable" and "independent variable" respectively [25]. Consequently, precipitation at variable levels versus altitude was predicted by developing individual equations for each scenario [22].…”

“…Consequently, precipitation at variable levels versus altitude was predicted by developing individual equations for each scenario [22]. This allows us to estimate how confidently one can be in developing a forecast from a convinced model/graph [25]. The developed elevation map was made using the SRTM, DEM 90m spatial resolution [21] in the ArcMap ver.10.30.1 version (Fig.…”