2015
DOI: 10.17705/1cais.03603
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Size Determination and Statistical Power Analysis in PLS Using R: An Annotated Tutorial

Abstract: Partial least squares (PLS) is one of the most popular analytical techniques employed in the information systems field. In recent years, researchers have begun to revisit commonly used rules-of-thumb about the minimum sample sizes required to obtain reliable estimates for the parameters of interest in structural research models. Of particular importance in this regard is the a priori assessment of statistical power, which provides valuable information to be used in the design and planning of research studies. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Statistical power is considered a critical issue for the validity of results of SEM models (Riedl, Kaufmann, & Gaeckler, ). To ascertain if our sample size ( n = 173) is adequate to achieve the recommended statistical power of 0.8 (Riedl et al, ), we run a power analysis for each structural path using Monte Carlo simulations as recommended by Aguirre‐Urreta and Rönkkö (). As shown in Table , the statistical power of all significant structural path is greater than 0.8.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Statistical power is considered a critical issue for the validity of results of SEM models (Riedl, Kaufmann, & Gaeckler, ). To ascertain if our sample size ( n = 173) is adequate to achieve the recommended statistical power of 0.8 (Riedl et al, ), we run a power analysis for each structural path using Monte Carlo simulations as recommended by Aguirre‐Urreta and Rönkkö (). As shown in Table , the statistical power of all significant structural path is greater than 0.8.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to establish the adequacy of our sample size ( n = 118) to detect the effect sizes obtained in the PLS analysis with acceptable power (0.80), we conducted a post‐hoc power‐analysis simulation following Aguirre‐Urreta and Rönkkö's () simulation procedure using R. We obtained the factor loadings for the items measuring each of the constructs, the path coefficients and residual values from the PLS run in Figure . We used a sample size of 118, 1000 converged replications and 500 bootstrapping re‐samples for the simulation.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For both detailed views, we ran additional R simulations (Aguirre‐Urreta & Rönkkö, ) to determine the power of the sample size to detect each path shown. The sample was adequate to detect nine of the paths (Table in Appendix D) including the two significant paths illustrated in Figure and the three in Figure .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We followed the recommendations of [62] to analyze if our sample size would provide good power and reliability of our model results. We calculated statistical power by taking into account our sample size (440), the observed probability level (0.05), the number of predictors (8) and the observed R 2 (0.291).…”
Section: Participantsmentioning
confidence: 99%