2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.trac.2009.10.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample pre-treatment and extraction methods that are crucial to arsenic speciation in algae and aquatic plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
27
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 66 publications
1
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…21 We confirmed whether or not the arsenic species were stable during the extraction procedure. Some sea mustard samples were spiked with a mixture of the six arsenic species and other sea mustard samples were spiked with one of the six species.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…21 We confirmed whether or not the arsenic species were stable during the extraction procedure. Some sea mustard samples were spiked with a mixture of the six arsenic species and other sea mustard samples were spiked with one of the six species.…”
supporting
confidence: 61%
“…Rubio et al (2010) reported a wide range of extraction 318 efficiencies among algae and plants with different extracting agents (6%-108%). Water is a 319 good extracting agent, since it enters the sample matrix and extracts the compounds 320 determined in the present study, as these are very polar and soluble in water (Francesconi and 321 Kuehnelt, 2004).…”
Section: Arsenic Speciation 314mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extraction efficiencies ranged from 57% to 106% and are 10 higher than usual values reported for alga, 8 thereby indicating that C. mediterranea presents most arsenic in water-soluble forms; thus we conclude that water is a suitable extracting agent for this macroalgae. However, fresh samples cut with knife give low extraction efficiencies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 43%