2004
DOI: 10.1126/science.1098993
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Sample Dimensions Influence Strength and Crystal Plasticity

Abstract: When a crystal deforms plastically, phenomena such as dislocation storage, multiplication, motion, pinning, and nucleation occur over the submicron-to-nanometer scale. Here we report measurements of plastic yielding for single crystals of micrometer-sized dimensions for three different types of metals. We find that within the tests, the overall sample dimensions artificially limit the length scales available for plastic processes. The results show dramatic size effects at surprisingly large sample dimensions. … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

57
1,086
9
13

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2,059 publications
(1,165 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
57
1,086
9
13
Order By: Relevance
“…These results are quite different from the results obtained from a series of small-scale experiments on face-centered cubic (fcc) single crystals of arguably lower crystal quality, which demonstrate smaller strengths with less scatter, and a clear size effect ("smaller is stronger"). [28][29][30][31][32][33] This behavior has been attributed to constrained dislocation interactions and geometrical limitations of source size for samples with dimensions between around 200 nm and 10 µm. For smaller samples, it is observed that dislocations run out of the samples, 34,35 leaving dislocation nucleation the only possible process for controlling further deformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results are quite different from the results obtained from a series of small-scale experiments on face-centered cubic (fcc) single crystals of arguably lower crystal quality, which demonstrate smaller strengths with less scatter, and a clear size effect ("smaller is stronger"). [28][29][30][31][32][33] This behavior has been attributed to constrained dislocation interactions and geometrical limitations of source size for samples with dimensions between around 200 nm and 10 µm. For smaller samples, it is observed that dislocations run out of the samples, 34,35 leaving dislocation nucleation the only possible process for controlling further deformation.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…T he deformation behaviour of small-volume metals, in particular the effects of sample size (that is, the diameter D of micro-and nano-pillars) on the apparent strength σ, has been attracting considerable attention recently [1][2][3][4][5][6][7] . A number of studies of single-crystal micro-and nano-pillars have demonstrated the 'smaller is stronger' trend, with the flow stress increasing markedly with decreasing sample size.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Также следует помнить, что пластичность ОМС зависит не только от абсолютного размера образ-ца, но и от геометрического соотношения ширины (или диаметра) к высоте [48,49], которое оказывает влияние на формирование полос сдвига и дефор-мационные процессы [50,51]. Образцы с соотно-шением высоты к диаметру ≤1 показывают высо-кую пластичность [27,52] образцов Zr-Ti-Ni-Cu-Be с надрезом при вве-дении усталостных трещин была значительно ни-же -18,4±1,4 МПа·√ -м [54].…”
Section: рис 2 схематическое изображение полос сдвигаunclassified